Redex68

joined 1 year ago
[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

There are many areas that can be improved upon to make games more realistic, just probably not graphical. NPCs using smarter AI, better physics, a more dynamic environment (better destruction, better NPC interaction with objects), and who knows what else that I can't think of now. There's still a lot of progress to be made, I just don't know if we'll have enough horsepower to run all of that, we're already reaching physical limitations on chips.

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Huh, I actually have that as one of my wallpapers on Wallpaper Engine. That's cool.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1936659308

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cereal, then milk. I will die on this hill.

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The main problem is that if they really started fighting, Wagner is wholly reliant on the Russian army to support them with ammunition. Wagner has no logistics and would quickly crumble from it.

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not like another mod from the same subreddit made a hostile takeover. Reddit itself removed the head mod. It's not like they can stop the owner of the platform from removing them.

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I don't really get chat but I think the difference is that replies are looked at as separate comments, they're decoupled from the parent comment.

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, it didn't really matter. The delta would be like ±10%, does it really matter? You're more interested in the magnitude.

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for pointing out. By NAT there I meant symmetric NAT which by my understanding would fix that problem as well.

But you're right, NAT wouldn't make sense, you could just add some rules to the firewall.

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

~~In general, you should probably turn on your router's NAT even for IPv6. What you mentioned is a security concern, and while yes, the IPv6 address space is enormous and finding a valid address is hard, if somebody already knows your IPv6 address it's a lot easier. For a home user there isn't really a reason for your ports to be accessible from the outside, and if you need such a thing, you can easily port forward specific ports~~.

edit: To add to that, turning on your router's NAT isn't a problem, you can always port forward, the problem with IPv4 is that you're behind two NATs, your router's and your ISP's. Because of this, you can't actually open up any port to be publicly visible on the Internet, which is extremely frustrating.

edit edit: Reply to my comment pointed out that what I suggest is retarded.

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I highly doubt you're gonna find a purely IPv6 ISP. You probably wouldn't be able to access everything, but I'd wager most of the big sites would work.

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well mogli su ga onda malo bolje implementirat al aj.

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

No, you're amazing

 

Ovi čepovi su najgluplja stvar koju san vidia u dugo vrimena. Teže ih je otvorit pravilno nego puknit.

 
 

Payday 3 gameplay trailer just dropped and the release date is September 21st

view more: next ›