OptimusPrime

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] OptimusPrime@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm honestly more confused than I was before. With so many opinions, I don't know how this could ever be implemented in a way that satisfies people.

 

Microsoft Research has developed Orca, an open-source project that introduces a progressive learning model based on GPT4. This model achieves impressive performance comparable to GPT 3.5 and GPT4 while using minimal storage and operating offline. By incorporating complex explanation traces, Orca enhances interpretability and addresses challenges in complex machine learning models. It outperforms other models in terms of accuracy, performance, and interpretability. The training process involves tokenization, sequencing, and loss computation. Experiments demonstrate Orca's proficiency in various tasks and domains, showcasing its capabilities in writing, comprehension, and reasoning. The research paper offers detailed insights and comparisons with GPT 3.5 and GPT-4, highlighting the potential of Orca to empower smaller models in competing with larger counterparts.

[–] OptimusPrime@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not taking it personally.

I would also appreciate the ability to customize, but it would be helpful to begin with a curated list of instances for each topic.

[–] OptimusPrime@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Why don't you read the issue? It's in lemmy-ui, so it's clearly client-side. So just because you want to waste your time going through hundreds of instances to find similar communities, do we have to force everyone else to do the same?

[–] OptimusPrime@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would prefer something pre-made for convenience but that can be modified by each user to adjust to their preference. I'd rather have a generalist solution forced on me than have to spend countless hours grouping communities from hundreds of instances.

[–] OptimusPrime@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

There could be conflicts between hashtags, as a hashtag for one community may not have the same meaning for another community. This would result in mixing topics and potential confusion.

[–] OptimusPrime@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Oh, I thought it was about tagging the communities and merging them based on those tags. Are you suggesting tagging the posts instead, and displaying all posts tagged the same from all communities across all federated instances in the same location?

But this can already be accomplished with the search feature. You only need to select 'Local' or 'All' and search for a word. People shouldn't be forced to hashtag every post, so the result would be the same as it is now.

[–] OptimusPrime@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I think conflicts can arise with hashtags just as easily as with community names, so it might be better to have an updatable and moderatable link instead.

[–] OptimusPrime@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 year ago

Lol this is a very good point. I'll give it some thought.

[–] OptimusPrime@lemmynsfw.com 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Cross-instance "multireddits", that are also automatic and topic-based. #1113

TL;DR: The suggestion is to implement an automatic multireddit feature in Lemmy that displays all posts from communities with the same name across federated instances. It aims to promote decentralization, avoid echo chambers, and ensure high availability. Community moderators would have the option to opt-in or opt-out their communities from being displayed. There are discussions about potential issues such as community name collisions, duplicates, abuse, and practical implementation. Some propose using a new link format, while others suggest providing users with a list of related communities.

[–] OptimusPrime@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Combining communities should be a front end feature… Allow users to merge their views if they want. But it should not be enforced at the backend or federation level.

Eventually there will be third party apps which can do this merging in their interface if someone wants it.

I agree with this. The grouping should be a front-end feature based on hashtags, as someone else mentioned, instead of the community names. Alternatively, there could be lists that you can simply copy and paste to create your own multireddit, eliminating the need for hashtags. However, considering that the original issue was already on the lemmy-ui, I'm not sure why you brought up the backend.

[–] OptimusPrime@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago

Every moderator would have control only over the content displayed on their instances, and not on everyone else, as it should be. The argument about having one or two large communities is a recurring one. There is no reason to have federation if we are going to centralize communities in a couple of instances. Then, if one of those instances shuts down, everyone in those communities would have to migrate. The main benefit of federation is decentralization.

view more: next ›