MouldyCat

maybe, but unless you're a believer in trickle-down economics, what do we lose as a society if they do?

the measures covered by this article aren't about people trying to reduce their tax bill though, they're about stopping dodgy tax avoidance schemes: "There is a mini-industry of creating tax avoidance schemes which have no prospect of success."

If I understand the article right, these dodgy schemes are mostly designed to make their promoters money from fees, because when they are overturned in court, the taxes people have improperly avoided will have to be paid. However the people who ran the scheme will have already taken lots of money in fees.

It's definitely one to add to my favourites, thanks. It's more of a priority for me to get direct jobs, as I much prefer to avoid agencies (and middlemen in general). I don't mind scrolling through pages of listings as long as at least 50% of them are suitable, which seems to be the case here.

Searching worldwide gives me almost entirely jobs in France. I also didn't see a way to filter for direct listings only (i.e. jobs posted directly by the employer). At least most of the jobs do seem to be direct listings, but annoyingly it is not obvious which ones are posted by an agency, and you have to read the ad carefully looking for phrases like, "Nous recherchons pour notre client...blablabla".

I also only use it to find jobs because it's easy to find only openings posted directly by the employer. I won't deal with agencies or 3rd party recruiters on principle, not least because they don't know what they're talking about and will send a bin man to an astronaut job if they can get away with it (armageddon_movie_but_this_time_its_a_huge_ball_of_orbiting_space_junk.gif)

The other big contender is Xing

This looks pretty good - although I see what you mean about the preponderance of German jobs! A quick search turned up 2000 in Germany, 200 in Austria and Switzerland, and just 4 in non-German-speaking countries. So at least there are some! Maybe they'll become more popular Europe-wide in time, I'll keep an eye on them.

You don't know what Geneva_convenience did or didn't mean. Unlike you, I didn't make any assumptions, I just asked them to clarify. They couldn't or didn't want to. Why you then came jumping in like a sad loser is anyone's guess.

If you want to talk about the subject of this post, then make a comment of your own. I'm not interested in discussing your assumptions about what some other person actually meant.

If we're talking about religion and conspiracy theories then yes, your religious affiliation is relevant. The more religious someone is, the more likely they are to believe in conspiracy theories, such as the ones I mentioned.

This thread started with geneva_convenience claiming the rape gangs were a hoax. That's crazy talk. They were not a hoax, heinous crimes were ignored and brushed under the carpet for years, children were seriously let down by the system, police and authorities missed many opportunities to help children in desperate need. There is no hoax there, and to call it a hoax is on a par with holocaust denial.

Your whataboutism to try to minimise the rapists' crimes is completely irrelevant and at best missing the point. No one is saying these are the only people to commit rapes, literally nobody is saying that.

I'm happy to talk facts. Start with telling me your religious affiliation. We can take it from there.

what's islamophobic about what I said? Everything I said is undeniably true isn't it?

Do you think people shouldn't be allowed to point out uncomfortable truths about your religion?

That's why I asked if you were muslim. Are you? If you are, you should know that the islamic religion was started by some guy in the desert who heard voices in his head, and he thought the voices belonged to a Jewish angel.

That's not very special - go to any mental care ward in any modern city, and you'll find plenty of schizophrenics saying very similar things. What makes Mohammed special was not the voices in his head, but that he managed to convince other people that he really was talking to this magical flying Jew (who was conveniently enough completely invisible and could only be heard by Mohammed), and they should follow him and do whatever he said.

So my point is that anyone in the modern world who believes a story like the Mohammed story has already taken leave of their senses, and it would be no surprise if it turned out they believed all sorts of other conspiracy theories, like 911 was faked, or the moon landings were faked, or the muslim rape gangs were faked.

You're beginning to sound like a bit of a conspiracy nut. Are you muslim? You'd have to be kind of nuts to think that a guy who heard voices in his head was genuinely talking to a real live Jewish angel rather than just suffering from untreated mental illness!

everyone screams hate slurs about Muslims

They do?

with multiple scenarios and multiplayer

CS2 is *only* multiplayer. Are you specifically looking for online-only PvP shooters? Or something with a single-player story?

CS2 has already been suggested, it works fine and def has very polished graphics, physics effects (e.g. the smoke grenades), and of course an active player-base which is essential for online-only.

Obviously it requires Steam - if you're looking for something outside of Steam it's going to restrict your options a lot.

If not, you've also got older versions of Counter-Strike on Steam - you can still play CS Source and I think maybe CS 1.6 is still possible?

I've also had no problems running Battlefield V on Linux - using Steam but at least you don't have to also worry about logging into EA's launcher, which is still there AFAIK but handled seamlessly in the background. I've not tried in a while - almost a year, there were enough players then to get a decent game going, not sure what it's like now though.

Another one which is (or at least was) popular is BattleBit Remastered - I've not personally tried it but it's on my wishlist and has a good protondb score.