I'm not sure if I'm understanding this one. But assuming that you're hosting your own server and you work away from home and want to connect in on the weekends. If you have https forced and it's also on in the app you're using to connect, any traffic between your end and the server is automatically encrypted. The only thing your ISP is going to see are data packets going from you to your server back and forth. Same if you're hosting for 10 users. All of VPN does is give you another point hop between the server and your client. Vpns are useful if you're trying to to block your ISP from seeing that you connect to a certain site on the internet. But just logging in remotely to your server it's absolutely useless.
MorksEgg
Right now this is something like the old wild west of the internet in the late 90s. I think a lot of the initial instances that were spun up weren't ready to deal with the amount of traffic they're seeing. Servers are probably being updated, upgraded. And then on top of that I'm not sure if the software on the back end was ever tested to scale with large volumes of incoming traffic, which might be causing bugs to appear. Add to that a lot of the apps we're using are in Alpha stages and maybe causing login issues and you can see it might be a cluster 💣 for a few weeks.
Sit down. Buckle in. Enjoy the ride.
I 100% agree that it's the owners choice if he decides to block content. But as far as I know if a instance is defederated and the instance owner doesn't publish a block list, users on the server would have no idea it existed in the first place.
There are already a couple of search engines that show instances. Maybe if some of the developers could add categories so people could find things they are interested in. This could be a useful tool for building communities. As long as it's an uncensored database of indexes I think this would be great. If you know one that is indexing instances by category please post it.
I'm sure instances will post guidelines and rules once they get everything straightened out. I'm just a strong advocate for personal choice. Once again I understand why some people want moderation and I understand eventually it may well be needed for some communities. As long as the owners are open about this that's fine, but not all operators are going to be transparent with these policies.
Also the nsfw is always on, no matter if checked or not.
Giving it a try now. One thing I noticed it's lacking or maybe I haven't found yet is a sort top by hour. A lot of people have been requesting this jerboa also.
Much better answer than I gave. My buddy's been hanging sheetrock and doing plastering and painting for the past 30 years. I've helped him out enough just to know that I don't know much.
If it's in a stud then yes. Most people just knock them in then fill them in with a little bit of plaster compound. Let it dry and sand with a high grit sandpaper. Then paint over. I can't really tell if that's paint texture on your ceiling where it's close up or if it's stucco. If it's light stucco it's going to be harder to patch without being noticed though.
Hey, cheers for this. I asked someone earlier in a post how to see what instances were shown and blocked. Is this published for all sites? Is there a way it can be hidden? Or is that the way it's built into the software? 👍
Semantics. If you defederate an instance, in this case lemmy.world blocks the instance /c/(hate group), you make the decision for everyone on that instance (you being the owner), on who can see what. This will create pockets of many little hubs instead of one big decentralized mesh network. This comes right back to the "owner" of the instance controlling everything that the user can see. I understand someone is paying the bills and that moderation is going to be needed. This is of course going to come down to choice. Is there a way to view each instances block list? If not it should be implemented into the back end somewhere, once again to allow freedom of choice.
What decision procedures are in place to stop rogue instance owners from making unilateral decisions? I admit I'm very new to lemmy and activitypub as a whole. If the community as a whole can weight in on the decision, then by all means, go ahead. 100% fair and I agree with you. I'm just against any type of actions being made by small groups of individuals that are "for the good of everyone". I really don't have an agenda here. I just want the freedom of choice for everyone. I'm tired of living in a world where there are people who think they know whats best for everyone else.
Thank you for your time to respond. Regards.
While I understand your wanting to ban such a community, I think moving away from that type of action is a good thing. It's all about personal freedom. I have some instances blocked already but I would never decide to do that for everyone because what gives me that right? Speak out against them. Make your views know. Denounce, Rage, never quit. But never censor. Freedom of information and choice is the end goal. Banning a topic is what leads to radicals because they have no outlet for their insanity.
Reddit hasn't been the same since they fired that lady who did the AMAs. That was the start of the decline. Then they went and hired that psycho lady who they had to shit can. Then Tencent bought a 30% stake. One of the tech acquisition arms of the CPP. There's really only one way it could have went.
I never had premium. But I deleted my 8-year account today. I took a screenshot as I was using power delete suite. I was tempted to make a throwaway account and post it to some of their subreddits that are still trending and see if I could start some kind of stupid little movement. Maybe they think a little bit longer if they start seeing people delete long-term accounts. And I'm sure there are lots of accounts out there that are much longer term and much higher Karma than me. Actually sacrificing some of those accounts could actually make a difference.