Mangoholic

joined 1 year ago
[–] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago

Genshin has some cool tricks like shell texturing for moss. A very good cell shader and custom vertex normals on the characters, making it a lot of work to recreate. Also it runs on mobile so it is heavily optimised, which also takes more time.

I would put Ori 2 on this list since similar to hades it has a destinct artists style and many 3d layers on top.

But the hardest to recreate by far not just visually but movement wise and ai and procedural animation is Rain world. Just look at the naking of it is insane how much custom tech this game has.

[–] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

Ich wähle so links wie möglich Deutschland ist rechtsextrem genug.

[–] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

What about, ubuntu mobile is that any good?

[–] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

AfD is a more difficult case because its a political party, but they are already being investigated. And have been assigned the far right group label. Kind of like strike 2 before a raid.

[–] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Look at the Iran, where woman are essentially slaves.

[–] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

If you read other sources it seems not to be without reason and they did the same with a self acclaimed nazi prinz before. They investigate then raid when there is enough concern, and if they find evidence that the group goes against the german constitution, they shut the group down. It doesn't seem to be just another isreal anti semit action. There are radical islamists in Germany and its good they are stopped before spreading. I am against the genocide, but there are islamists who want to push their woman oppression and other extrem views using the genocide to spread their views, both extrems suck.

[–] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Trump is also openly pro genocide so why would this be an argument.

[–] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Does that change anything?

[–] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

In the end we need any solution that reduces emissions. Nuclear could be one of those, especially the thorium reactors that can burn some of the existing nuclear waste, are looking promising. Other than that, renewables are the way to go for sure. Still it won't solve other carbon sources, its just the energy sector. It cannot fix agriculture emissions, but maybe indirectly the building emissions, with new tech like electrically recycled concrete or green steel.

Will this happen in our current society... probably not, its just more profitable to fck the planet.

[–] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Or your post gets deleted by a mod

[–] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

He was a disappointment since the beginning. Cum ex scandal cancelor

[–] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

Desktop for work gaming, Laptop to watch movies in bed or work game while traveling long timeframes. Phone always somewhere close by, but only for reading, music staying in touch etc.

 

When I looked at the different political systems currently in place around the world. I noticed one core issue. Power corrupts people, be it democratic elected, rich or authoritarian there is always an incentive to abuse said power for personal gain. It also attracts people who strive for power, who usually experienced a lack of control in life and are unsatisfied.

In an ideal world politicians should work for the good of the people, but that seems impossible in current systems.

So how do you build a system that doesn't insitivise using political power for personal gain. I think it is a rather tricky question.

Some of the ideas I had feel free to discuss:

  • Strictly limit the legislative period without exception. (minimizing the time exposed to power and possibility to using it for personal gain)
  • A politicians elected get permanently limited in their private posetions, in exchange for the opportunity to change policy. (you need to give away personal benefits in order to gain power)
  • Punishment for thresholds of personal gains. In our capitalist society for example, I cannot imagine any billionaire, who did not exploit and therefore use violence against other people in order to reach these riches. I think it is fair to assume, that no one can reach this amount of wealth, without any moral wrong doing. It therefore could be classified as a crime and procecuted as such.

Any criticism and ideas are welcome. I'm no expert, so excuse me if I got something wrong. These are just ideas.

 

I had this idea for an open source app like Spotify or YouTube, where everyone can join and add content to it. Consumers pay either by donation, subscription or ads to keep the server and development running (non profit) and increase the content creator pool of money.

Every click or view gives the artist a % of that money pool. But they get alot more when they still have little amounts of views and more if they are loyal to the platform. The more they get, they ll reach a point where they have enough money to support themselves by making music or videos.

After this point you get more or less exponatially less money per view, but in return they fund all the other starting artists with their success, while still having a solid but slower growing income source. Making monetary success a more community driven goal.

Just an idea any critique/addition is appreciated.

view more: next ›