That's a false dichotomy in a lot of the comments here
We do both
Carbon capture isn't so we can continue to use fossil fuels. It's because once we get to 0 emissions we still need to draw down the carbon in the atmosphere
An ounce of prevention is almost always worth a pound of cure but we're still going to want that cure because every extra tenth of a degree we can bring the Earth back to normal is going to be worth it
The title for this article was written by Skynet
Skincancer.org is my source for darker colors being better protection
I don't have the highest degree of confidence in it but it makes sense to me that absorption matters more than reflection because a lot of the reflected UV will be going through the shirt and onto your skin
That's why materials like linen aren't as good for UV protection. They're light weaves and let a lot of light through, still
Tradeoff is dark colors absorb more UV so it provides better protection from the sun
I know it's referencing this but don't know enough about Bayesian probability
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/cracking-open-a-cold-one-with-the-boys
Paris Major, of course
I originally thought the wheels had oxygen in them somehow but they're just benzene rings
http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.6901.html
This version is less confusing some still maintaining the bicycle shape
Article says we likely caught them early and they're hopeful for eradication
I hope they're right!
Took me a second
They wouldn't call the year 59 bc in 59 bc
Can you not afford an air conditioner? A heatpump is only marginally more expensive