GrainEater

and... my... my axe...? right? fellow younglings?

unléss wé gét a néw icé agé

joke's on you -- no skin left

I don't know what qualifications these journalists have w.r.t. verifying the authenticity of the documents, but let's assume that they're genuine. Do they contain some actual evidence to support the allegation that China is committing genocide, using slave labour, or something similar? (These are extremely serious allegations to make, so they ought to be very confident about their conclusions.)

I think you have rather odd definitions of "unprovoked" and "national security interests"

Here's a useful video, if you have an hour to spare

If they're authentic and correctly translated, yes. Doesn't mean the source is irrelevant. Considering the BBC's track record and the fact that this man is employed by the US government, I would recommend being extremely skeptical.