CriticalResist8

Lemmygrad gets "hate" because we're one of the most active instances and liberals cannot stand that communists are not only allowed to talk about communism, but that they actually get attention and activity. Deal with it.

Tell me more about this togetherism 🤔

Mate you glow brighter than a nightlight on a car battery hahaha

Stremio does that too and more, it's the netflix equivalent of torrents. cannot live without it anymore.

Lol, I'm also tall and I tend to slouch a bit because I want to be on other people's level. I think we just have to accept that we're taller and stand up straight, I have to remind myself.

How's the anarchist lemmy instance going?

lmao okay defend the Ayn Rand libertarian website if you want, what do you want me to tell you?

https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Wikipedia

Are you white and male by chance?

Wikipedia is not volunteer run... They're using language to make it seem like it's a little website with a dream being bullied by the mean Russians. Wikipedia is run by its administrators, who do not let anyone else encroach on their power. 3 editors are responsible for most edits (I want to say 90%). Famously there is one editor that edits from 6 am to 10pm every day without fail (mostly pro war edits) , and the most prolific editor worked as a TSA and ICE agent terrorizing migrants.

He would still have a long way to go to give us back our surplus value.

Ukraine is the main proponent of the genocide narrative. Without their efforts (helped by the US), people wouldn't really care that much about this famine. Famines happened and still happen, this one was nothing special as far as famines are concerned. Ukrainians would remember it as a darker period and be grateful that they have food now (an argument demolishing the genocide narrative is the fact that it did not work, there were no further famines, and the population refilled without problems). Non-Ukrainians might think about it once in a while but wouldn't really care all that much because there have been many other famines, in our own countries as well.

There have been famines in China, there have been famines in Europe in the early 1800s at the latest... I'm talking about purely "natural" famines here (not helped by government inaction, but not caused by the government on purpose either). The 1933 famine is on the same level for me. Yes, I want everyone to have food. But no, I can't bear the world's problems on my shoulders. One thing at a time; and this was 100 years ago. It's ancient news. Especially as the USSR doesn't even exist anymore -- not like the monarchy that caused the Irish famine is still alive and well today.

But that's not what anti-communist, pro-nato Ukraine wants you to think. If this was treated like other famines, it wouldn't be politicised like this.

edit: hit send too soon.

Ukrainians love Ukraine so much 10 million of them (1/5th) left since 1990.

It's such a serious country in fact that the current President is a humorist who played the role of President on TV before his election -- perhaps as a trial for the job?

Today, claiming to speak for all Ukrainians, the pro-NATO government is remembering a famine recognized as a genocide only by 16 countries, that happened almost 100 years ago and affected other populations in a country that does not exist any more. The name of this "genocide" was made up by neo nazis in the 1980s for its resemblance to the word Holocaust.

lol MLM in this context means Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.

But I also see nothing wrong with making fun of these MLMs.