BakedCatboy

joined 9 months ago
[–] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Fuckk I'm not autistic to my knowledge but I feel this so much in online interactions especially and it's so confusing. I'm usually trying to contribute information or just have a conversation and people often think I'm trying to argue (I guess because presenting new information automatically = dunking or being argumentative somehow) and I've ended up just not wanting to interact much or I preemptively try to phrase things as questions (like "isn't x" or "I thought y") and it's so exhausting trying to do that all the time and it makes me want to crawl in a hole and not interact with anybody.

[–] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't the article about tv boxes that you use with your dumb TV so you can watch streaming stuff on it? I don't think any TVs are affected

[–] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Our ISP sends 3 strike letters :(

[–] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago

I tried the .ps one and it worked for me

[–] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I use a nuc10i7fnkn and since transcoding is almost entirely done using the dedicated quicksync hardware in the CPU you don't end up actually using the CPU much. So I'm sure it would work on an older generation or the i5 version. I don't know much about the N100 but it looks like it would be very capable. Supposedly it boosts to 3+GHz and it's a 10nm node compared to my NUCs 14nm. But the GPU has the same number of execution units so I'm not sure if the quicksync transcoding performance is that different. I saw someone mention 3 simultaneous 4K transcodes and I think I got about that much on mine. Generally for quick sync performance you just compare the Intel hd or uhd graphics model (like 630, 730, uhd, etc) and the number of execution units and that should correlate to the performance. Also check the Wikipedia page for quicksync for codec compatibility (under the Hardware decoding and encoding section), but anything recent will handle most stuff you'd need: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Quick_Sync_Video

[–] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I actually run my arrstack on a Synology, it has official support for docker and docker-compose. Granted I do have a higher powered model (the DS1621xs+) but most of the arrstack is fairly low power friendly.

You can also get away with running Plex on a nas but I would only do it if 1. Your nas has a quick sync supported CPU and you get that enabled properly or 2. You go the direct streaming only / no transcoding setup - which means checking the codec support for all client devices and either only downloading exactly the supported codecs or pre-transcoding everything.

What I do is actually run Plex/JF on a separate nuc and point it at the nas using a network mount. Just don't use a network mount for the Plex app database (maybe same applies to JF too), just mount the media files itself. Running Plex and having it access the DB over a network mount is a big no no for various reasons.

[–] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

This is super cool! Yeah you can copy and paste but it's harder to copy the entire thread with all the comments because you'd need to expand them all. I would probably feel more skeptical if it wasn't bring-your-own API - it'd be neat to be able to hook this up to my local ollama instance.

[–] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thanks for sharing, I don't have watchtower updating my instance automatically and I just realized it's a little behind.

[–] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

I think Google might just be calling block lists "externally hosted code". As I understand it, there are several restrictions: the severe limitation on the number of rules, the requirement to bundle rules with the addon (and the associated delay due to extension store review), and the loss of many advanced rule types that change blocking behavior based on different factors in order to avoid detection and otherwise be effective.

The ublock FAQ has some interesting details too: https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-asked-questions-(FAQ)#filtering-capabilities-which-cant-be-ported-to-mv3

[–] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm on unrooted lineage with mindthegapps / Google play services with my Google Services Framework ID registered with Google, but I still have to make 3 attempts to log in to my bank with the first 2 attempts always giving a vague error like "we're not sure why we couldn't connect", similar with fidelity. Using a password manager so I'm entering the same credentials every time.

(Edit: in the case of fidelity, instead of faking a connection issue it tells me my account is blocked and to call support to unblock it - that's also fake because I called once and they said my account wasn't locked and trying to log in a second time always works)

My understanding is that it's impossible to pass strong integrity unless you're using the stock unmodified rom with the bootloader locked.

I changed banks last week and the new bank (Aspiration) logs in fine the first time every time.

It sounds like the situation is better with graphene but I find it a lot easier to switch banks than roms.

[–] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"This app won't work for your device" :(

[–] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago

It's better because PPA isn't about targeting ads at all. It doesn't share any browsing history, topics, or any information for ad targeting to advertisers at all. What it does do is provide a way for a website to tell your browser which ads are relevant to an action you take - for example on a checkout confirmation screen the site may tell your browser "here's a list of ad IDs for the shop you just bought from". Your browser then checks if it's seen any of those ads, checking completely using local data that doesn't leave the browser, then to an aggregator it reports which ads possibly led to your purchase. The aggregator increments a counter for each ad in its database and relays the totals to the advertiser. There are no unique identifiers or any information about your habits or interests involved.

When I initially heard about PPA I also thought it was related to FLoC / topics, but it has nothing to do with ad targeting or sharing information about habits / interests, it's just a way to tell advertisers "Ad XYZ was effective and led to a sign up/purchase" without revealing who saw the ad or any personal information about them, just the total number of people.

 
view more: next ›