Well, if you actually ever support someone, and they appear to be a bad person, you should know you paid them for their art style adding to not knowing they were a bad person, so you're not actually guilty. Also, even that person deserves a possibility to become better and start over, and thus, they shouldn't be cancelled. That's what we both know, am I right?
ArsFireside
joined 1 year ago
Sure. What happened to Alec Holowka is a pretty blunt and cruel example.
Sexist, huh... It's interesting. May I ask you to elaborate further? Thank you in advance.
Digital piracy not being an immoral crime (or crime at all) and not making one a horrible person.
Social Justice Warriors forcing their agenda and worldview into languages, movies, books, and games, and cancelling everyone who did something regrettable in the past.
Okay, thank you for your answer! I appreciate it!
I know, I know.
Yes, we're talking about humans here.
I'm not trying to blame you for not believing or anything like that. We're just discussing, that's all. I'm trying to say that various things can exist or not exist, regardless of them being proven or not. Even not being proven, God still can exist. As well as there are various things in the past that were once proven, but didn't actually exist and later were deemed as mistakes or misunderstandings or some other phenomena.
So absence of evidence is the evidence of absence, did I get it right?
Okay. And, he doesn't exist because of... Why? What makes you think that?
view more: next ›
Okay.