this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
26 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

82 readers
2 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A BBC presenter has been accused of paying a teenager for sexually explicit photographs, beginning when they were 17, according to The Sun.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rain3h@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Someone who's a beeb star isn't presenting their radio show tomorrow.

Makes you wonder.

[–] born2rune@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it's Craig Charles, I'm going to be miffed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theory@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jeremy Vine only does weekdays right?

[–] richyawyingtmv@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

He's already stated on twitter he's back on Monday. It's not him.

[–] Rain3h@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago

So they finally cought up to gordon the gopher huh?

About bloody time.

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is legal isn't it if the victim was 17? What is there to investigate?

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Age of consent is 16 but I think both parties need be 18+ for sharing explicit selfies.

[–] SMURG@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Which is a pretty retarded law if you think about it.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As with Philip Scholfield, there is such a disparity in age and power that it becomes very iffy. I'm not sure there's anything illegal going on but it's morally problematic.

[–] MuckleWiggles@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago

The problem with "moral" problems is, who sets the morals? The church has been setting them for years, but they are now regarded as outdated and, to be frank, not a shining example of good "morality".

[–] Magnus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The guy inside the Mr Blobby suit?

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

There is no-one in the suit - the BBC's best kept secret.