this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
50 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

1257 readers
75 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
50
AAAA (lemmy.ml)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by SkullHex2@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

AAAA

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Definitely the correct answer.

It's a drag and drop appimage manager, like macOS DMGs. And it's a flatpak!

[–] Ropianos@feddit.de 7 points 11 months ago

There is also AppImage Launcher which works nicely for me. It automatically integrates AppImages into the DE (e.g. search and start menu) and a few other nice things.

https://github.com/TheAssassin/AppImageLauncher

[–] MiddledAgedGuy 6 points 11 months ago

I symlink the AppImage. It's still a manual process in that you have to recreate the symlink but feels like less of a hassle than updating the desktop file.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago

Use a package management system that supports this use case.

[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 4 points 11 months ago

Isn't that kind of AppImage's whole thing, to behave like Mac apps that you just double click on regardless of where they are, and not have a package manager?

I'd go for the Flatpak if you want it to be managed and updated.

We went from distro packages to Flatpak to bare files and circling back to reinventing the package manager...

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Don't. Use a proper package manager for permanent installation of things. There's a reason we have those.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 4 points 11 months ago

I am a big fan or repackaging Appimages as Flatpaks, with appstream metadata, sane package management (not the windows way or simply nothing at all), sandboxing and desktop entries.

There are some repos on Github that do that.

https://github.com/trytomakeyouprivate/Appimage-To-Flatpak

[–] hallettj 4 points 11 months ago

As a Nix fanboy I would write a Nix expression that downloads the AppImage, and also writes the desktop file with the appropriate path written into it via string interpolation. That can be done either through a NixOS configuration, or in any Linux distro using Home Manager.