this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
115 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

1457 readers
22 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I watch a fair amount of series, but I'm not a data hoarder. I see the value in 2GB episodes, but I watch most series on my laptop, my simple 1920x1080 tv or even my phone where that value doesn't make a difference. If I want to have a theater experience, I'll go to the theater.

Most of the times I just want to enjoy a good story and relax before I go to bed.

I don't have infinite storage and I hate when I want to download something new, but Im out of storage, so I have to delete stuff first.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Good enough for who? You? Sure. But not everyone watches on a small screen. Some people might actually care about the quality too. Some of us can't goto the theatre.

2GB isn't large by any stretch. There are 720p versions of pretty much everything (at least that's what I see on most Usenet Indexers). You could easily get a multiple terabyte external drive if your internal storage is full.

[–] ayaya@lemmy.fmhy.ml 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Yeah complaining about storage space in 2023 is a bit silly. You can go on eBay right now and get a used 4TB SATA drive for $25. Even cheaper if you get SAS drives, you just need a SAS expansion card which is also around $20 or so. 6TB SAS drives are going for $30.

ISP data caps are a bigger enemy than raw storage capacity these days. It costs me $50/mo to remove my 1TB cap. Which means it is more expensive to download 6TB than it is to buy 6TB of physical storage. And even SSDs are dirt cheap now. Storage has never been cheaper.

[–] LuckyCharmsNSoyMilk 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Am I the only one that doesn’t like the idea of used hard drives?

[–] ayaya@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I am using unRAID so if one dies I can just replace it. About 4 years ago I bought a lot of fifteen 3TB SAS drives and I have had them running 24/7 since then. Funny enough not a single one has died. They all had around 5 years of power-on hours and now they are up to 9 and still going strong. Honestly I expected to lose at least one per year but they are surprisingly resilient.

[–] LuckyCharmsNSoyMilk 4 points 2 years ago

Fair enough. Also using Unraid so I guess overall it's not a bad idea. I just need to actually get the damn things.

[–] Retiring@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I didn’t know data caps are still a thing. Where is this?

[–] ayaya@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The good ol' United States. Most of the major ISPs have caps here and you do not really have multiple choices because they basically have monopolies in their respective areas.

[–] Retiring@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

I did not know that! I remember data caps being a thing here in the middle of Europe in the early 2000s. There haven’t been data caps for home internet connections for a long time.

[–] iopq@vlemmy.net 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Maybe try watching a 1080p HEVC or AV1 episode, 200MB for half an hour or 400MB for an hour and it looks amazing

[–] Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

HEVC is a great codec. Not everyone is encoding with it yet. Couple that with "fun" scene rules and we get what we get. 😅

[–] Pulp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago

The amount of old content still on ancient codecs is disgusting

[–] briongloid@aussie.zone 35 points 2 years ago (2 children)

500mb 1080p HEVC for most shows on a 75" TV, but if it's a space sci-fi show with lots of dark scenes I need that 1GB-2GB episode.

Some shows get by on 200MB, but it depends how static the scenes are and how much lighting there is.

[–] yoichi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Surely at that size you would notice the artifacts. Just for my sake can you try a Bluray remux. I expect it's 4k so you could just grab a 4k web-DL and see if you can notice the difference.

[–] iopq@vlemmy.net 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Depends, for animation there's no artifacts say that size

[–] briongloid@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago

Yes animation like Rick & Morty are fine at even 100mb.

[–] worfamerryman 1 points 2 years ago

I got a 200mb strange new worlds and immediately stopped it and got the 1.8gb on. But 200 is fine for something like modern family or friends.

[–] chahk 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I paid for this 4k TV, so damn it I want all the pixels!

Seriously though, resolution is only half the equation. Bitrate, HDR, and compression methods are very important as well.

[–] richyawyingtmv@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Not on my 65" 8k OLED they aren't! You can absolutely tell the difference.

Smaller/low res screens though, sure.

[–] Sharpiemarker@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's what I'm saying; not everyone watches media on their phones. I have a Plex server at home with a projector and a mediocre 5.1 (not a HTIB). No way I'm running anything less than 1080p.

[–] richyawyingtmv@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Ha, yeah. I work from home, and when I'm out the last thing I want to do is look at my phone.

So I watch films at home. I paid for a high end home cinema set up, I'm gonna make the most of it. Otherwise it's just a waste.

This may change as I'm having to downscale a bit for my new apartment...but yeah, 200mb still won't be enough.

[–] people_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Why not just use those streaming sites then? You don't need to download anything

[–] haych@lemmy.one 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Most streaming sites are even worse quality.

[–] hellequin67@lemmy.fmhy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

Bearing in mind the community you're posting in I wouldn't think they were suggesting the big streaming companies.

Kodi + (insertname)debrid or stremio+ (insertname)debrid .... either will let you stream torrents in much better quality than the streaming sites and no need to horde.

Also, i'm fairly sure there's some torrent clients that allow streaming of the torrent file, I'm not sure if they're still around but I think Vuze was one, I don't used desktops any more just mobile/tablet so my knowledge might now be out of date.

[–] seaturtle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
  • Saving files for offline enjoyment/no dependence on internet connection.
  • More player and playback options: easier rewind/fast-forward, chapter controls (for many releases), etc.
  • Fewer ads/pop-ups/phishing/etc. nonsense (depending on how effective your browser's adblockers are)
  • Often, choice of subs and dubs. Generally better ones than the generic DVD release subs. And sometimes, even commentary tracks.
[–] matey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

I actually prefer the Jellyfin interface even when I have access to content through another service.

[–] haych@lemmy.one 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, 300-350MB h265 is great for anime. The 1GB+ are fine and all, but I'd rather save storage space.

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Anime encoders squeeze the most out of the h265 codec... Its astounding how they achieve great quality video for the filesize, even in scenes with fast motion or odd vignettes/filters

[–] ayaya@lemmy.fmhy.ml 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Even the highest quality anime isn't very complex compared to any live-action footage so it compresses incredibly well. The better groups also use vapoursynth filters to fix errors on the blu-rays like bad anti-aliasing and banding. So the best encodes will actually look better than a remux which is never going to happen with live-action.

[–] SmokeFree@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

As long as you are happy with that, all good. Fuck the people that sets a standard for you.

[–] BitterSweet@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 years ago

The rise of HEVC and AV1 is arriving! Keeping the quality with a smaller file size. Plex and most android devices support AV1 now too!

[–] fiah@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 years ago

my laptop, my simple 1920x1080 tv or even my phone

yeah well that's cool but I like my media big and (when appropriate) loud, with as high a quality as I can get

[–] arcrust@lemmy.fmhy.ml 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Your best bet would be to use handbrake and transcode them down yourself. I have a relatively. I've setup for my living room and thus want to get the best quality I can. Exact opposite reasons to you but, It's easy to downgrade, basically impossible to upgrade.

But that's my two cents. Ideally, every file is uploaded with both of us in mind.

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I was just going to say, handbrake is a good way to cut back a bit on file size if you get the settings right. It is very taxing on hardware tho.

[–] worfamerryman 1 points 2 years ago

Can’t you just use hardware encoding?

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

1337x has tons of episodes that are that size. It seems to either be ~200mb or 2gb+ though. It would be cool if there were a nice middle ground.

[–] Pulp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Well that is a super helpful comment. 🙄

[–] omgnvq@feddit.nl 8 points 2 years ago

You could transcode your downloads and store them at a lower quality if you want to save space. It is extra steps though.

[–] veloute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

absolutely agree. for most shows, I don't particularly care what I download, but for specific shows like GoT, I'll go for the high quality x264 copy

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I forgot about GOT! Yes, I got larger files for GOT as well.

[–] Pulp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] veloute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

some of the best releases are still in x264. can't wait for av1 to be more mainstream, though.

[–] seaturtle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah, I agree, I can understand wanting higher resolutions but there are diminishing returns and even 1 GB for a half-hour episode is pretty absurd.

Plus, you can't seed what you can't keep.

[–] Watcher@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago

I downloaded some 200mb episodes on telegram but I've never seen such bs before. Because of that I only download from the Usenet and have a look on the nfo before.

[–] jpablo68@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

40MB anime episodes are perfection 200MB episodes are good

[–] drunkensailor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

couldn't agree more. I watch pretty much everything on a 50" 720p TV from 10ish years ago. as long as its not some god awful 240p pixelated garbage, I'm fine. When I go over to some buddies places where they have newer nicer tvs and the qaulity is better, I still am 99% focused on story and idaf about the pockmarks on someones face etc.

I don't hate extra quality but end of the day, i want to prioritize disk space without having complete garbage on quality. love it when encoders can do stuff in x265 instead of x264 to cut off a few extra MB.

i have a theory that when quality started going crazy (2K by my mark) is about the same time where story quality in tv shows started taking a big dive. Byt I'm sure lot of ppl not agree lol.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

For me, that size in fullHD in x265 is indeed good enough.

[–] Marxine@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Agreed, since I mostly watch stuff on my not-4K laptop or my not-4K phone.

For people who like to watch stuff on huge 4K screens and stuff, they'll require higher quality videos, but as long as everyone has their needs meet I'm more than fine.

load more comments
view more: next ›