this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
116 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1083 readers
4 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (5 children)

wasn't there a movie about this being a bad thing? i'm pretty sure there was...

[–] Sabata11792@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An entire category of movies saying "don't do this exact course of actions ever"? Sounds like a good starting guide!

[–] blackluster117@possumpat.io 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But the autonomous fighter plane learned about 2000s Alt-Rock and made jokes! It's a good guy!

[–] Sabata11792@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

New light novel just dropped-My Ai Girlfriend is a Thermal Nuclear Bomb that Wants the Launch Codes.

[–] drwho 4 points 11 months ago

That movie inspired a lot of folks back home to go into this very line of work. They completely took the wrong lesson from it.

[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

There's been at least a couple.

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] LoamImprovement 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Man, someday you're gonna have a blast watching the Terminator movies for the first time. Maybe even today!

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[–] lemillionsocks 1 points 11 months ago

Well according to the third movie judgment day is inevitable, talk to the hand. So maybe they just figured they might as well be the ones to do it.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they should just buy a tesla

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Yes, until now a Tesla killed more people.

[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh great, Skynet is actually the US millitary.

I'm sorry we're like this.

[–] drwho 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Who else would have the money to build Skynet?

[–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's not about the money, it's about principles.

[–] drwho 1 points 11 months ago

Principles are nice, but they don't pay software engineers, nor do they pay for hardware.

[–] ObstreperousCanadian@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I look forward to them being equipped with the ability to refuel by consuming biomass, self replicating, and having unbreakable encryption so they can't be stopped!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] waspentalive@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you want a Butlerian Jihad? Cuz this is how you get a Butlerian Jihad!

[–] DarkenLM@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think the Butlerian Jihad can't do shit against Judgment Day.

[–] waspentalive@lemmy.one 1 points 11 months ago

Why not both?

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Is the US preparing for a war with China? Cuz it certainly sounds like it.

Quote from the article:

The Pentagon is working toward deploying swarms of thousands of AI-enabled drones, according to a notice published earlier this year.

In a speech in August, US Deputy Secretary of Defense, Kathleen Hicks, said technology like AI-controlled drone swarms would enable the US to offset China's People's Liberation Army's (PLA) numerical advantage in weapons and people.

"We'll counter the PLA's mass with mass of our own, but ours will be harder to plan for, harder to hit, harder to beat," she said, reported Reuters.

[–] drwho 5 points 11 months ago

It seems like they're preparing for a war with anyone and everyone. It's not like the US has the greatest reputation across the planet, and there's no shortage of dust-ups around the world that might get pointed in the direction of North America at some point.

[–] lemillionsocks 3 points 11 months ago

China has been militarizing and between the gender gap, the soon decline in population, and recent global attitudes towards them shifting , theyre going to be in for a world of economic hurt. A large population of unattached young men with poor economic outcomes doesnt bode well for peace in that region.

Likewise the US policy of "surely embracing capitalism will lead to a liberal democracy" gave way to mild hostility towards china when it didnt happen. Especially with a president for 4 years who kept saying those quiet things other presidents didnt outright say because they knew it would be poking the bear for no reason.

God help us all if this actually happens because it would lead to a world war centered on Asia and china, and I hope that what will happen with the age gap and decline in china will mirror more japan, but we do live in uncertain times.

[–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

The US wants its ass kicked, lol.

[–] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 5 points 1 year ago

Paging James Cameron...

[–] sxan@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

Thanos: it was... inevitable.

[–] lemillionsocks 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This is absolutely horrifying. Humans are already bad enough at identifying targets and minimizing collateral damage and civilian casualties.

How does one program a drone that can identify targets independently, while also not easy being fooled by someone disguised as a noncombatant and child? I guess in theory the drones could be more expendable than manned targets and therefore have an even more strict policy on firing on potential noncombatants(even if that is easily exploited) but I get the feeling they wont do that.

[–] DarkenLM@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Easy: murder everyone. Which will probably be the course of action this Skynet will take.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

I think they are able to make it work when they manage to insert "If he wears a turban and a beard, shoot." They have already shown that the marines often did not use other criteria either, Reuthers knows about this.

[–] P1r4nha@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Might be more humane after all

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)