My immediate reaction is “why?!?”.
Followed almost instantly by “well, someone should probably be doing it”. Then “I’m really glad it isn’t me”. So I guess thanks for your service.
We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time (tm) ). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.
My immediate reaction is “why?!?”.
Followed almost instantly by “well, someone should probably be doing it”. Then “I’m really glad it isn’t me”. So I guess thanks for your service.
I've been pretty selective, mostly YouTube channels that do 'Tech Documentary Stuff' cause I enjoy re-watching that. LGR would be a prime example.
However, I integrate all of these in my Kodi infrastructure, so only large channels have metadata online in the TVDB or the like.
For those without, I'd love some tips on something to generate Kodi compatible series metadata directly from YouTube.
With TubeArchivist, all the metadata is stored in an ES database and can be queried via API. There's already a Plex and Jellyfin plugin folks are using.
Can you link me on the Jellyfin fork??
I'm using TubeArchivist as well. My collection is slightly larger than the OP's at this point. I collect everything from personally-enjoyable and re-enjoyable content, random stuff at risk during policy changes, to stuff from my early internet years that seems to slowly rot away on the internet. I also like the new themes
Whats going on at Youtube?
No offense, but I don’t get it.
One could safeguard thousands of movies, song, art of any kind, that might disappear because some of it becomes lost media. Instead some prefer to backup content made for an ad platform.
I genuinely want to know what these 1m are about
I think independent media has the biggest potential of becoming “lost media”. With potential no other copies of this media accessible online, I find it increasingly important to have this backed up.
You’ll always be able to find a copy of Forrest Gump online, but go through your liked videos on YT and see how many are lost forever.
This is a big part of it IMO. Even 'streaming exclusive' stuff that see's no physical release gets pirated enmass so many copies exist. Few people copy YouTube content however, since it's already online, free, and easily accessible. ...Until the day it's not accessible of course.
Because some of it is really good?
One could safeguard thousands of movies, song, art of any kind, that might disappear because some of it becomes lost media. Instead some prefer to backup content made for an ad platform.
Let's be clear here, movies, songs, and most art are also vehicles to serve you ads or generate admission/purchase revenue off the consumer. Like you criticize YouTube for being an 'Ad Platform' but elevate 'Songs' as if you've never heard of a radio station?
Funny enough, most films, music and other content are much better protected from being lost. They are mass produced, mass released, and have many many many pirated copies not to mention retail physical copies. YouTube on the other hand? People take for granted that it's there, online, easy to access from anything, and much of it doesn't easily have redundant copies on the internet so it vanishes in a flash when removed from YouTube.
Can I just use this as a downloader and then move the collection to Jellyfin? Or is there a way to link this to Jellyfin?