Isn't this just straight-up bad for the company? Doesn't refusing to participate in arbitration open them up to lawsuits instead, which are more expensive and less favorable to the company?
this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
69 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37725 readers
45 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Considering they also refuse to just pay their bills I don't know what people expect
They are just trying to delay as long as they can until they run out of money and shut it down.
Brilliant. Fuck, I hate this guy.
Same. He's just the billionaire of billionaires, the apotheosis of billionaires.
Then every single case should default to judgment against Twitter and in favor of the employee.
What a fucking scumbag.
I hope this fucking clown-house leads to laws being passed protecting workers from this kind of shit in the future.
For real, this deep-fried dumpster fuck needs to leave the planet.
I assume California has harsher penalties for failing to arbitrate?
Just when you thought this company couldn't stoop any lower with their BS, they manage to sink further with something worse.
view more: next ›