20% seems really low, but I guess it's better than 0%
this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
33 points (100.0% liked)
World News
22086 readers
10 users here now
Breaking news from around the world.
News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
For US News, see the US News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
But 20% within 6 years seems absurdly high. Unless 25%+ of the land is already designated as 'nature' then all they need to do is not turn it into a parking lot. Still a pretty big ask.
Not enough to achieve something, but enough to pretend that it might do something.
“If you have an outcome-based approach and you do not reach the goals, then you have to apply additional measures […] whereas now you say okay, I tried, but unfortunately, it didn’t turn out the way I wanted to,” Paulus explained.
Politicians and producers love good ideas that will attract the public's attention, but should be tweaked just enough to not be executed as intended.