this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
589 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

1357 readers
14 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

To all the burn it down and rebuild leftists (by protesting and not voting for the lesser of 2 evils) tell me how well that went for the Communists in Germany and Italy the last time mask off fascism rose to power there....

Edit: Not one of these "Self-righteous leftists" have addressed my question about what happened to leftists in Germany or Italy when fascist took power there. Its almost like they dont give a shit about the Prolitariat and would rather engage in purity politics rather than support the working class or marginalized communities. Absolutely pathetic astroturfing, or simply a complete disregard for the Materical Conditions on the ground in America.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you think that Germany or Italy wouldn't have gone fascist if the leftists just voted harder?

The historian in me eagerly awaits your reply

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/piano_drop.jpg

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not saying that voting harder back then would have changed anything, but drawing a parallel between then and America today where mask of Fascism is very much on the ballot tomorrow and a year from now in the presidential election. Not voting to protect one's ideological purity is the height of privilege.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Okay but voting didn't prevent fascism in those countries. Fascism didn't happen because some communists and anarchists refused to vote, it happened because of class war on the part of the petite bourgeoisie and precarious haut bourgeoisie

[–] klyde 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Voting is like paying taxes: It sucks, you don’t get anything you want, but not voting leads to problems.

I mainly vote to prove it doesn’t help and I haven’t been proven wrong since 2000

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] patomaloqueiro@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Voting is important, but only an organized revolution is capable of breaking the system that fucks us up

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] akariii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I find a lot of people arguing that one shouldn't vote because although easy, it is the least effective form of political engagement.

I'd argue that you should vote because it is the easiest form of political engagment and, if possible considering your material conditions, you should also try to participate in other forms of engagement.

Yep, I think that's uncontroversial...

[–] seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, voting is the baseline. It's the least you can do.

I'm sure that there are anarchists out there who refuse to vote out of principle, but they still do activist work such as participating in mutual aid groups and so on. They're wrong, but at least they're still helping society in some way. I think the vast majority of people who don't vote are just lazy, though.

[–] PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbt 3 points 1 year ago

And then there's the marxist-leninists who saw the government ban black people and women from voting, see the Republicans trying to make it harder for black people to vote, and then said "when minorities vote it helps fascists", because they're clowns.

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I consider voting to be the minimum buy-in to ask something of your representative. You may not get that thing, especially if your ask is far outside the mainstream. That's part of a democracy. The next part of democracy is protecting its status as a liberal democracy, where the people's freedoms are protected from the government so there is remove for improvement.

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Slaps table THANK YOU!

Especially since those people refuse to actually provide an alternative form of political engagement besides vague references to a revolution, which has absolutely zero chance of coming out in the Prolitariat's favor in Americas current political climate, because there is nowhere near enough class conciousness for that to happen.

[–] seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Even when the Proletariat does win, they often still install a dictatorship. Because those are the kinds of people who lead revolutions.

[–] g8phcon2@teacup.social 14 points 1 year ago

This attitude is why Americans have two shitty right-wing parties

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Liberals, please acknowledge that if there is a possibility every election that fascism will win, fascism will eventually win unless you take political action outside of electoralism

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is why it's important to build strong democratic institutions to resist fascism, populism, and the like. They won't last forever, but they can take a few election cycles of abuse. Part of the problem with many countries that have truly fallen to fascism or fascist-like movements is that they started out with weak or non-existent institutions. Contrast that with the US, where even the election of Donald Trump of the "Lock Her Up" slogan (very fascist) got basically nowhere with both prosecuting Hillary Clinton and overturning the 2020 election.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This sounds nice but doesn't really address what I said in any way.

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How so? Fascism is rarely a matter of a single election. It's usually a slide. Providing a bulwark against that slide means you have several election cycles to snuff out fascism and return to liberal democracy.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So you're just crossing your fingers and hoping the fascism goes away on its own?

What are the historical and material causes of fascism? How do they influence how you should respond to fascism?

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Rereading the thread, I think we're in agreement. I was more adding onto your point, that building strong institutions and norms is important along with political activism. Institutions and norms slow the rot from the inside, political action slow it from the outside.

[–] seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fascism has already won if you're a person of color.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, that is just the status quo in a settler colonial state. Fascism has distinct economic structures that haven't coalesced yet.

[–] 31415926535@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

THANK you. There's been so much negative trolling on lemmy, really getting me down. Seeing your post actually reminded me I need to re-register.

[–] gothicdecadence@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Not every state or county is having an election, you can check to see if you can/should participate here https://ballotpedia.org/Elections_calendar

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

OP demanding people vote, 'regretted not voting hillary' and then calling people SJW in the comments. Just your average liberal fascist.

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Lmao where did I demand people vote? I asked what the dude calling me out was doing irl besides being an internet sjw, while fully acknowledging that I very much am an internet sjw. Dude couldn't give me one answer and called me going to multiple ceasefire protest in D.C. as being a performative action, like no shit, thats what protesting is, showing your disdain for what your country is doing with my physical presence. Y'all are so fucking dumb.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Liberals don't respond to criticism with ableism challenge 2023 (IMPOSSIBLE)

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also calling someone a sjw isnt nazi terminology, thinking that sjw has a negative connotation makes you align with Nazis who view social justice with a negative connotation. Lol

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The term literally came from the alt-right, a neo-nazi movement which started as a result of reddit banning r/jailbait

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

There is nothing wrong with being a social justice warrior lmfao, the fact that they abriviated it doesnt make it nazi terminology, nor does it make being a social justice warrior a negative thing. You are actively reinforcing nazi ideologies by implying that being an sjw is a bad thing.... cause advocating for social justice is a good thing lmfao.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If by "came from" you mean "was hijacked by".

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I fail to see how "caring about social issues makes you a bad person" can come from anywhere other than the greasiest pedo-nazis.

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Lmao what?!

[–] ntma@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The people who vote are loses.

These are the people who think electing some person they never met or spent any alone time with will magically make their lives better.

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

If you've never met or contacted your representatives, that's likely by your own choice. They generally make themselves fairly available to some degree.

[–] monk@lemmy.unboiled.info 3 points 1 year ago

Electing a random citizen of my country instead of the current leader would make lives of people all around the globe better in mere months, no magic required.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

My local election is just to renew some levy

[–] phourniner@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Doesn't voting not matter because it all gets decided by the electoral collage anyway?

[–] ntma@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The people who vote are losers. They're people who think electing some person they met or had any alone time with will make their lives better.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

As opposed to the people who don't vote because they live under a rock or in their mom's basement?

I mean, I'm kidding, but people you've never met can absolutely fuck up your life when in comes to politics.