this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
68 points (100.0% liked)

Risa

227 readers
1 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/7802418

Don't forget about the Irish unification of 2024!

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ChicagoTransplant@midwest.social 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mao is pretty much the opposite of what the federation stands for in almost every respect.

[–] bigboig@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lol really ticked off the tankies. Don't tell them starfleet hq is... in America!

edit: sorry, I have been informed tankies' localization actually has star fleet headquartered in... San Fransokyo from Disney's Big Hero Six?

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

...And yet, the Enterprise is armed. If power does not come from the ability to effectively use violence, but from some other means, then why would the Federation arm it's flagship?

[–] LoamImprovement 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Devil's advocate, but parts of the Trek universe have shown that there are non- or quasi-sentient creatures capable of endangering starships like the Enterprise, in addition to the usual spacefaring hazards like asteroid belts and debris fields, and the potential to encounter, for lack of a better term, space pirates. It makes sense to arm the ship for a number of reasons not necessarily related to the power of coercion via the threat of violence. The Enterprise's weapons are also frequently outclassed by other ships of similar size designed for combat. It feels more akin to packing bear spray or a noisemaker to scare off wildlife, and the bear spray gets used to drive off a robber.

That said, the threat of violence against a better-armed foe in order to prevent combat is a trope the shows rely on frequently, so you have a point.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Aside from an episode of Strange New Worlds (and possible in Wrath of Khan, depending on your perspective), space pirates aren't brought up as a risk to the Federation starships, presumably because they usually aren't. Shields alone should be sufficient for debris and asteroids, since shields appear to stop physical objects as well as certain forms of energy (obvs. not certain bands of light though, or whatever bands their sensors use). Non- and quasi-sentient species shouldn't pose any risk to a starship at all (aside from possibly omniscient comets, thank you Stanislaw Lem). The weapons on a starship are appropriate to direct against planetary settlements, bases, and other starships.

Fundamentally, I believe Mao was correct on this; the ability to use violence effectively is the lowest common denominator for all power. Everything else is a veneer of civility intended to disguise the violence that is inherent to all forms of coercive rule.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is that someone I should know?

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Captain Jean-Luc Picard of the USS Enterprise.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know that one what's the other guy

[–] hallettj 12 points 1 year ago

It's Mao Zedong. He said, "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun." He also led China to mass starvation and terrible poverty, so not someone Picard would subscribe to.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 1 year ago

"The pen is mightier than the sword."

"But is the pen mightier than photon torpedos?"

[–] kbal@fedia.io 2 points 1 year ago

There is a kind of political power that grows out of the barrel of a gun. That thing must be destroyed.