this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
187 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

46 readers
1 users here now

Talk about anything tech related!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] factionparadoxes@lemmy.fmhy.ml 39 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Another unsurprising shot in the foot for Twitter... certainly limiting how much users can engage with content/see sponsored posts will make more money!

What on earth is this decision? Is there even one possible benefit for this, for anybody?

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What makes this self own even better is the code used to limit reading, doesn't actually limit requests. So Twitter's users are DDoSing the site with the official app.

https://sfba.social/@sysop408/110639435788921057

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

No worries. It's not as if they recently fired most of the people who could fix it quickly.

[–] WytchStar@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These guys think the service they provide is so invaluable, so critical to the lives of their users, that they're betting on those users' willingness to shell out for the experience they're accustomed to.

It doesn't seem like a winning strategy but he's desperate to turn a profit off this thing and I don't think the long term is much of a consideration right now.

[–] zalack@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

The really criminal thing about this is the for some users it is that critical.

So not only are they vastly overestimating how critical their service is to the average costumer; they are also totally fucking over a minority of users for whom it is critical.

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

When Elon shoots himself in the foot, I scream, "No, stupid! Aim higher! Hit a vital organ!"

[–] DefenderOfTheWeak@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Yep, I just started to unfollow accounts on Twitter, leaving only needed ones because you'll never know when you hit the limit

[–] Hiccup@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is all fucking hilarious at this point. He's stripped any and all value from Twitter. Glad I already put a read limit of 0 in place.

How to dismantle a decent and viable company in any % record time speedrun.

[–] Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And all because he's just petty at how his twitter value manipulation to make some money didn't work out.

[–] MsPenguinette 1 points 1 year ago

Funniest calling of a bluff in history

[–] 312@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Verified accounts are limited to reading 6,000 posts a day, he tweeted, while unverified accounts are limited to just 600. New unverified accounts are at 300 posts a day.

This is absolute amateur hour. Why are people still trying to use Twitter.

[–] Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

600 posts per day is damn nothing, yikes

[–] 312@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

Especially considering the way twitter counts a “view” is if the tweet shows up in your app’s viewport, at all. So simply scrolling through the timeline consumes “views” - you could run up against this limit in 10-15 minutes of scrolling.

It’s incredibly stupid.

[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 6 points 1 year ago

Even 6000 is nothing. I remember when I used to be on the platform for hours per day, following hundreds of active users, and actively sharing to thousand of users… I’m not paying then (wasn’t an option) and I’m not paying now (not interested), but even if I did, I’d go through that in minutes!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PhasedMoon@lemmy.fmhy.ml 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is crazy. I don't know what Elon is doing. Even limiting his paying users is cringe.

[–] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

All of these assholes running companies built entirely on user-generated content are infuriated that AI startups are scraping that content to train their models.

[–] kelce@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like a tiered subscription is incoming. My hope is that Twitter implodes completely instead of just becoming a right wing echo chamber like it's trending towards now.

[–] aebrer@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It's already tiered, it's limited to 600 tweets if you are unverified and 6000 if you are "verified" (aka paid for a checkmark)

What even is this reality lmaoo

[–] WondrousFairy@lemmy.fmhy.ml 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So, so far this year we've got Imgur, who thinks the internet does not run on porn, Twitter who thinks keeping users from their service is a good idea, Reddit who thinks nuking their freely made moderator infrastructure works and Youtube who also thinks randomly banning people who are smart enough to use ad blockers won't have any effect.

At this point, I'm starting to make up increasingly bizarre theories as to why techbros have suddenly all collectively gone insane. The one I came up with this morning was that they all snorted coke of the same hooker's ass which was somehow tainted with a brain eating amoeba.

[–] chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 year ago

What... Huh?? Twitter is limiting the amount of engagement users are allowed to have? Is that what's going on here? Do they actually think that this will make more money or are they just really insistent on making Twitter users touch grass?

[–] Sp00ky94@lemmy.fmhy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is crazy. I want to see if it actually blocks you from reading tweets. The article didn’t say when this goes into effect though.

[–] imkmiaw@lemmy.fmhy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

It just displays a message saying "Cannot retrieve Tweets at this time, please try again later" after a couple of minutes of browsing.

Also, aparently this

[–] Otome-chan@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

this is what it looks like for me. can't view my home feed. can't view tweets. etc.

[–] briongloid@aussie.zone 8 points 1 year ago

My account is 12 years old, this took less than 3 minutes;

[–] NoNipArtBf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A couple weeks ago I got a new phone and made the choice to not transfer twitter over, because it had become increasingly depressing amd frustrating.

This really just reassures the site is a lost cause. Fuck Elon.

[–] Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

I had to uninstall the App because Elon was forcing notifications for his bigoted tweets even if you didn't even follow him. wtf...

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav 4 points 1 year ago

CNN has reached out to Twitter for comment, but the platform responded with an automated poop emoji

Everything that man touches turns to pure concentrated cringe

[–] LezBeClear 3 points 1 year ago

What is the end game of limiting your users ability to interact with your service? Like how can you serve your ads and/or your political agenda if you cut off the doom scroll?

Make it make sense.

I mean, just looking at this from a practical stand point, how many people actually look at 600 posts a day, that seems really excessive. I doubt 95% of twitter users are going to hit that limit. Though it would look a lot less like a money grab and more to keep information gathering if he'd made it a flat 6000 across all accounts instead of just the verified ones

[–] eagleeyedtiger@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So apparently Twitter has been refusing to pay it's Google Cloud contract, which ran out at the end of June...

https://theconversation.com/twitter-is-refusing-to-pay-google-for-cloud-services-heres-why-it-matters-and-what-the-fallout-could-be-for-users-207718

EDIT: It looks like they resolved this recently, see comment below. So I wonder why the drastic change.

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Soon - Elon asks his engineers, "Why has ad hits gone down so much?"

Engineers: "..."

[–] Sp00ky94@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

It’s like huffman and musk are sharing ways to screw over users and their platforms. I get a company needs to make money but personally, I don’t think this is the way.

[–] skellener@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Just walk away and let it burn. Goes for both Twitter and Reddit.

[–] I_Miss_Daniel@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

He can torch Twitter. He can torch Tesla. But if he torches Starlink I'll be an unhappy chappy.

Mind you, it's caused NBN to offer unlimited satellite plans (Australia's government run national internet hoohaa) so there is a slow but viable alternative.

[–] Endorkend@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Bizarre can't even begin to describe the decisions being made at Twitter.

[–] Sylveon-Z@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Twitter is shooting itself in the foot even more then I had thought possible. First no browsing without an account, now there's a limit to how much you can read in a day?

[–] bwhough@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can’t believe Elon built these new and improved Twitter backend servers from consumer grade carbon fiber and a Logitech controller.

[–] I_Miss_Daniel@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine having to type your public key in with a Logitech controller...

[–] platysalty@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

A Bluetooth one

load more comments
view more: next ›