this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
416 points (100.0% liked)

196

667 readers
66 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 62 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Polywork is when you get fucked by multiple bosses.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I can't handle any more than two but im a guy.

[–] insomniac_lemon@kbin.social 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

hWhat the hell is polywork? Next thing you're telling me you're apartment-fluid.

Not gonna make it because you're an overtimecel.

A called-up shorty! Busting it down, ~~burnout-gigw-~~ hustler-style.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really wonder: are the journalists writing such articles truly that deranged or is someone paying them?

[–] Maven@lemmy.sdf.org 42 points 1 year ago

"Embrace" is a strong damn word

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh would you look at that, the rich coming up with yet another positive euphemism for a problem they're causing so they don't have to feel so guilty about it

[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh no, they don't feel guilty at all. The euphemism is to normalize it so that we, the "sheeple", keep our heads down thinking it's normal and just something "everyone" has to deal with.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I'm more inclined to see who is actually falling for this bullshit. Like these chucklefucks keep coming out with these new terms and explanations for how us getting fucked is normal, who on the world is reading these thinking "oh yeah, that makes total sense"

[–] SternburgExport@feddit.de 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This only works one way around tho. If we want to work less hours a week we're lazy and don't want to embrace a better work-life-balance or something.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

it would be alright if it were two part time jobs that added up to full time work but i bet it's not.

at least then if you get fired from one for no reason you still have half your income stream

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then you still have two commutes instead of one, two shedules instead of one, conflicting overtimes and attention spans, potentially two bosses that are jealous because you aren't just their employee...

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

depends on the job, there's plenty of roles you can do only in the morning or only in the afternoon, or only in the first half of the week/last half

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

It would if healthcare and retirement was handled by the state.

[–] Granixo@feddit.cl 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] blindsight 1 points 1 year ago

As someone with two "real" jobs and two side jobs, it's because of interest rates. I can't afford my house unless I work more than full time.

On the plus side, my two main jobs have job security and benefits, so I'll be able to retire early since my pension will scale with my extra FTE. Or I can keep working to the usual retirement age and give lots of extra cash to my kids to start their adult lives debt free and with a head start on a house down payment. So, it's not all bad.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Because people need to eat and have a roof over their head. Choosing just one of these doesnt work for long.

[–] FUCKRedditMods@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

We aint embracing shit