this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
168 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37735 readers
45 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ono@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago

Nice to see some of the alternative client apps listed at the end of the article.

I'm especially looking forward to the upcoming new voice chat system: Element Call.

[–] SrTobi@feddit.de 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Matrix is awesome. Such a pitty that not more people are using it. Though 110 million is already quite a lot

[–] tesseract 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The main problem with Matrix is that the protocol is too big. There's no server and client that's feature complete, other than Synapse and Element.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Encryption key handling is horrible. It makes Matrix a terrible choice for non-technical users.

As a replacement for IRC, it's fine. Bridging is limited to a small handful of platforms, or a limited set of fairly technical users with access to money to run cloud services and the willingness to take on maintenance of a hodgepodge of software services and the corresponding network security risks. I'd argue that this part was poorly thought out. It puts the core value features out of reach of the majority of the population.

It would have been better to focus on a client-side bridging design. Or, something more accessible. And the fucking horrible encryption design, oy.

[–] SrTobi@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you mean specifically by encryption key handling? You log in, confirm it with one other device, done. Don't see where I ever used technical knowledge?

I agree there are weird glitches und sometimes bugs, but they mostly get fixed. Mostly :d

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You log in, confirm it with another device (better hope it's nearby! That first setup of a 2nd client is a doozy of a feel bad, if it isn't), then a few days later it just stops letting you do anything, doesn't really tell you what to do about it, and you have to reconfirm with a 2ne device all over again (which, again, had better be nearby).

[–] ono@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You log in, confirm it with another device (better hope it’s nearby! That first setup of a 2nd client is a doozy of a feel bad, if it isn’t),

Your devices don't have to be nearby to verify them. You can enter a key backup passphrase instead.

then a few days later it just stops letting you do anything,

That's not normal. Looks like you ran into a bug. Did you report it, so it can be tracked and fixed?

I gather from their weekly reports that they've been fixing encryption bugs lately, and that the clients now in testing (the Element X code base) seem to have them solved. You might want to try those, or one of the third-party clients.

[–] pkulak 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The new Rust library is really solid. Once things start moving to that instead of rolling their own, it will get a lot more smooth.

[–] YuzuDrink 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can you tell me more about this? I’m running a synapse server at the moment, but if there’s about to be a smoother Rust option, I’m interested!

[–] derin@lemmy.beru.co 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There technically is Conduit , but it's still in beta.

[–] pkulak 2 points 1 year ago

It’s a client library only. Keep running Synapse. :D

[–] pkulak 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I do wish they just let you disable encryption for all rooms at a server level. But years ago people gave the team so much shit for not supporting encryption that they added really good encryption, but it makes things harder. Nothing is free.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Any good matrix server recommendations?

[–] twei@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can recommend tchncs.de if you are in germany

[–] upstream 3 points 1 year ago

A 1% recommendation 👌

[–] ono@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think more people would understand what you mean if you asked for community recommendations (or space recommendations if you want to use the Matrix-specific term). What Discord calls a "server" is not a server in any normal sense of the word, so it's going to confuse people who aren't Discord regulars, especially when we're talking about a different network that has actual servers and self-hosting support.

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

+1 to this I open matrix and its very boring compared to opening discord. ☹️

[–] sag@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It doesn't matter which server you are on;You can join any Matrix rooms. Additionally, you can bridge your important Discord announcements or chats using t2bot.io .

[–] rglullis@communick.news 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you are looking for professional hosting, https://communick.com/services/matrix has been around for some years. ;)

If you just want a free, donation-based alternative: I hear good things from techncs.de

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No I'm not looking for hosting. I am looking for a server of alcoholic schizos and political extremists.

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

Ah, you're looking for reddit?

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

you mean a chat room.

[–] sag@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago
[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

The question is, how many servers run sliding sync?

[–] tslnox@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] salarua@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 year ago

opt-in analytics! servers running Synapse can choose to send a bit of analytics information like number of users, but it's opt-in so the number is potentially even higher

[–] rottenwheel@monero.town 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Matrix isn't decentralized, it's federated.

[–] ono@lemmy.ca 44 points 1 year ago

Federated is a form of decentralized.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 year ago

look at the word, decentralized just means it's not centralized, which is true for matrix.

the word you're thinking of is "distributed" like with torrents, which matrix can sort of be but isn't in practice.

[–] thingsiplay@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Matrix is decentralized, as the servers are independent from each other. They choose to cooperate, so that people can talk to each other. But the servers are run by different people or organizations and act independently. Or do I get it wrong? If so, can you explain why Matrix is not decentralized?

[–] ono@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

You got it right. Matrix is decentralized. It's just not peer-to-peer (although there has been some work toward making it so).

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

If Matrix was here, he’d laugh too.