this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
217 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

1259 readers
84 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Gradience, Flatseal, Loupe Image Viewer, and Resources running on Ubuntu 16.04

Firefox 118.0.2 running on Ubuntu 16.04

Door Knocker, Collision, and Cartridges running on Ubuntu 16.04

ASHPD Demo running on Ubuntu 16.04, showing a notification through XDG portals

According to Door Knocker, almost half of the portals are unavailable on Ubuntu 16.04, compared to only one unavailable on Fedora 39 with GNOME, which means Flatpaks running here may have more limited capabilities than usual.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] julianh@lemm.ee 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool testament to flatpak's strengths. If an OS update makes a breaking change it won't affect the apps. Makes sense that it works backwards too but I never thought to do it.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

but only because the apps don't get the updates

[–] Heratiki@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Ok, so it’s time for me to do some research on Flatpaks now. I’m an old schooler from Redhat days and haven’t kept up with the new stuff all that much.

[–] LinuxSBC@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As well as running on all distros, it also provides other benefits:

However, some applications don't work as well because of the sandbox, but I think this will change with the rising popularity of Flatpak, as more developers will use portals instead of direct access. Also, there are some bugs and missing features, like how heavy use of the org.freedesktop.Flatpak portal for dbus causes a memory leak (https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-dbus-proxy/issues/51), but it's overall pretty good. Most applications I use are Flatpaks.

[–] hottari@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Flatpaks are to distros what Alpine is for docker containers. A base for creating distro agnostic desktop applications. It's really cool and has picked up quite some good support within the Linux community.

[–] Piers 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AFAIK it's a system to let Linux software bundle all of it's dependencies up with it so it just works in a self contained way that doesn't care about what else is and isn't installed.

Advantages is that they are more reliable and user friendly than traditional approaches to Linux software installation.

Disadvantages are that they have bigger footprints where you might have the same dependencies I dependently installed for each app rather than as a single installation that they all utilise and that they need to be updated individually (as part of the flatpak.) IE if basically every app uses the same dependency and it turns out to have a huge security hole, under normal Linux software the developer would patch it, you'd update it and the hole would be filled. With Flatpaks you need each individual Flatpak developer to update the version used by their Flatpak and for you to update all those Flatpaks before the hole is plugged. I think I remember they run in some kind of sandbox to mitigate this though.

[–] miracleorange 3 points 1 year ago

(This is going to be grossly oversimplified and possibly minorly inaccurate, but) Flatpaks are built against and run using shared runtimes, so if two Flatpaks share the same basic dependencies (and those dependencies are included in the most common runtimes, which they usually are), you only have to download the shared runtime once. Every Flatpak built on the same runtime will share the one runtime. The way you described it is a common misconception.

Now if the packager manually bundles less common dependencies into the app itself, yes, that would have to be individually updated, but that's theoretically more of an edge case.

[–] knobbysideup@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Mint integrates flatpak seemlessly into its graphic package management and update tools.

[–] Frederic 2 points 1 year ago

Same, I have MX (Debian based) and have 100% native and 0% flatpak... Old grumpy bearded guy

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Another big advantage of Flatpaks is the portability, since they live in your home.

I've had to reinstall distros and swap to different ones a decent amount. I simply backup and restore my home dir, and all my flatpaks get carried over, appear in my app launchers, and usually have their app data saved so I don't even have to relogin/reconfigure to stuff. It's as if I had just closed and opened it again.

It's crazy this works even when completely swapping distros.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I run Arch Linux (by the way) on my work laptop. One time Unity botched their game engine on Arch, so I had to rollback my whole system to keep an older version of GTK just so I could keep doing my work.

For a good 6 months, any up-to-date application had to be a Flatpak, because updating my system was off the table. Completely saved my bacon, and let me stay on top of rolling-release apps with ease.

[–] DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

You could set up a development environment using distrobox in an arch container and keep the downgraded packages installed in there if it happens again

[–] yum13241@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[–] nicman24@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol like yeah that is its point and also its weakness

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] nicman24@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

you are still running 7 year old code with no security updates

[–] syaochan@mastodon.online 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@nicman24 Ubuntu 16.04 ESM will have security updates till 2026

[–] sebsch@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not the universe. Ubuntu is one of the most unpatched systems out there.

[–] nicman24@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

oh nvm i read something in the title wrong. also dont count on fast fixes for the kernel they have repeately lagged or even never arrived in older lts

[–] IverCoder@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

This is a completely patched Ubuntu 16.04 through the Extended Security Maintenance program.

I would have tried this on Ubuntu 14.04 (supported until 2024) but Flatpak never supported 14.04 in the first place.

[–] kib48@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

what's the one missing on Fedora 39?