this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
278 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37735 readers
49 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://radiation.party/post/32518

[ sourced from The Verge ]

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anji@lemmy.anji.nl 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because what Twitter really needs right now is less engagement.

[–] nodester@partizle.com 12 points 1 year ago

They're trying to juice up their stats for advertisers. More registered users = more surveillance capitalism.

[–] howler 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is hilarious. The biggest inconvenience this will cause, is people asking "can you post a screenshot? I dont use Twitter."

[–] grahamsz@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is kind of a disaster for emergencies. Twitter is the defacto social network whenever any disaster strikes round here, the sheer volume of people, emergency services and the versatility of hashtags make it great for that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Elbrond@feddit.nl 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, that makes it even easier to never visit Twitter again. Right now I was sometimes tempted to follow a link and see what it was about, but I'll be happy to quit that habbit too.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

Right? It's annoying but I've seen a few people aggregate news to a bunch of Twitter links. Now they won't be able to do that and engagement will go down even further.

[–] esaru 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Twitter users can't post to the general public anymore. Their posts are visible to users logged into Twitter only. That should render Twitter useless to whoever wants to post something to people on the Internet. I wonder what journalists, companies, or politicians think about it.

[–] Kuroneko 29 points 1 year ago

Welp, this kills Twitter for me permanently. I closed my account after Mush took it over but sometimes I’d check out tweets and replies my Discord friends would share. Big tech just keeps shooting itself in the foot lately.

[–] Cat@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

These social media giants seem to be self destructing themselves on purpose.

[–] Celediel@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago

A culture entirely based on growth will do that eventually.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tester@lemmy-test.223308.xyz 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Man seeing all these big websites kill themselves slowly with poor decisions, kind of gives me hope for the future of the internet. Now we just need facebook to really mess up, and things will be even better.

[–] Liempong_pagong 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Right, monopolies crumbling will give space to innovation. No one company will buy up smaller company and then put their innovations behind closed doors, never to be seen again.

Though I doubt google wiill go under for what YouTube is doing. Google is stilll huge and profitable. Most likely it will outlast all of it's peers from the 2000 dotcom boom.

Twitter, on the other hand, well. It's on its 9th live and is hanging by the ledge.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Disgustoid@startrek.website 15 points 1 year ago

That's certainly one way to begin a social media detox along with Reddit's idiocy over third party apps. This will make it much easier to ignore Twitter since I deleted my account there and have no intention of signing up again just to view tweets.

[–] arcticpiecitylights 14 points 1 year ago

This feels like a big milestone in their enshittification journey, and also in the maturity of the fediverse. Part of what made Twitter so widely popular I think is that tweets were available to everyone, not just the few people who were online enough to actually have an account. To lock things behind a wall after so many people have left seems like a bad idea.

[–] thingsiplay 13 points 1 year ago

Thank god. Hopefully Elon Musk will require a blue checkmark to be able to make new tweets.

[–] TerryTPlatypus 13 points 1 year ago

Can already tell you this is negatively affecting furries. A lot of people use Twitter as a platform for furry art and discussion. Now that Twitter can't be accessed by the public, furry art can't be spread as easily theough embed, and this hurts furry artists in the long run.

Actually, more generally this could hurt artists period.

[–] trashhalo 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] cavemeat 4 points 1 year ago

Huh, in that issue thread someone posted a tweet from the devs stating that it's temporary, for what that's worth.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

That was the first thing I checked after reading this headline. Sad. It looks like you can still get some pages but they probably aren't updating.

[–] Qiz 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Will this affect Google search? That’s got to be a good driver for Twitter right?

Maybe trying to get people that end up there after a search to sign up would be a better tactic.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 8 points 1 year ago

Good, I don't want to use Twitter anyway. :)

[–] jonsnothere 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This could be companies scraping Twitter to feed large language models. If so, I'm glad we're keeping Twitter out of the corpus for whatever the next GPT is

[–] ag_roberston_author 3 points 1 year ago

They cut off API access for anyone not willing to pay 45k a month, then are surprised when people use bots to scrape the site instead of using the API. So they then rate limit their users. Hilarious.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sculd 6 points 1 year ago

Annoying as F. Especially because so many "news" websites just embed tweets into their story.

[–] aedyr@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

I'm sure this will work out well for them. The legacy social sites are really on a roll this summer.

[–] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've never used Twitter, but on occasion been linked to something there. So if that's intentional they're killing off that kind of traffic on purpose. It seems all these corpo social media sites are monetizing themselves to death.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bermuda 5 points 1 year ago

I mean it kind of already was, right? You could view specific tweets and a couple replies before a banner showed up asking you to sign in and preventing you from scrolling further. It did the same thing if you tried to click on certain things. I had a firefox extension to bypass it which worked wonders. I assume there'll probably be a new one for this.

[–] irongamer 5 points 1 year ago
[–] Mikelius 3 points 1 year ago

Ugh. I hate Twitter, but there are still a few stubborn accounts (that aren't on Mastodon) I follow via the app, Fritter. Fortunately nothing that's going to kill me, but rather just annoy me.

[–] flip@lemmy.nbsp.one 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Seems like nitter still works. Interesting how everyone, YouTube, Twitter, Reddit seem to try to to squeeze more money out of their platforms by making themselves shittier.

[–] jmk1ng@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

This is what happens when you don't pay your cloud hosting providers. They start throttling you before cutting you off entirely.

They're frantically trying to get Twitter capacity down to match the current throughput. It has nothing to do with scraping.

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

It's a weird day when I read a read a Tim Sweeney quote and agree with him.

load more comments
view more: next ›