this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2022
6 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

787 readers
63 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/198544

While it has been argued that the choice of smartphone architecture might protect user privacy, no clear winner between iOS and Android emerges from our analysis.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adrianmalacoda@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

Apple can be the most privacy friendly company in the world (it isn't) and it still wouldn't make up for them being hostile to user freedom and right-to-repair.

[–] sonalder@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

I would say that Apple isn't as bad as Google. But they are not good either. The best way to be private is to educate yourself so you'll learn what's ggod or bad for you. In general everything that is cloud based like iCloud or GoogleDrive has to be avoid. For me a degoogled-phone is good enough (CalyxOS)

[–] arthur@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

Short Answer: No.

Long Answer: Noooooooooooooooope.

[–] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

DeGoogled Android based on AOSP is almost certainly the winner in terms of phones that are fully functional, stable, with good app support. Linux Mobile is probably better for privacy, but it's still very much still in alpha development with all the issues that come with it.

[–] isleofmist@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Pinephone with Android emulation (Anbox or Waydroid) seems like a decent system.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

In theory or in practice? Last I saw it looked promising but was still not very usable yet.

[–] Decentralizer@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

iOS is collecting for Apple, Android is Google, but Google is a advertising company. Our of the box iOS is probably better (keep in mind Apple is a closed garden and you cant really see the code). I run GrapheneOS for my daily driver. But I also have an iPad. With Adguard you can block a lot, including with the right host file Apple domains. You can also via ADB degoogle a Samsung or any other android device.

So android gives you more options when it comes go blocking trackers, apps, etc. iOS is probably out of the box a little better, but you have not much ways to lock things down.

[–] isleofmist@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

I can't imagine using a device where I can't install programs I want to install. Apple not allowing sideloading of apps is simply ridiculous.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

I agree that compared to the average carrier-provided or manufacturer-provided Android system, iOS out-of-the-box is less horrifically bad for privacy. But that is an extremely low bar :)

but Google is a advertising company

Apple is also in the advertising business, and is also an NSA collaborator.

[–] isleofmist@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No. You can't even sideload apps in an IPhone.

[–] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

More than that, Apple's app ecosystem, both iOS and Mac, seems to be the least open source out of the consumer platforms. Even on the official Android and Windows app stores, a lot of apps are actually open source. That's much rarer on Apple.

[–] isleofmist@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago
[–] foxglove@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

This is a study of 24,000 Android and iOS apps and looks at tracking in particular. The authors conclude that neither platform is better than the other. What I felt was missing from the analysis was just and overall comparison of anti-tracking features in both Android and iOS. I think that's more important (especially since privacy is not the default in most cases and requires user intervention) and would love to see some information on that if anyone has any.

[–] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Android, especially AOSP ROMs, can be rooted, at which point it will let you configure the HOSTS file to sinkhole tracking domains. iOS can't do that, the best you can do is use a VPN or DNS server that blocks trackers.

Also, iOS has no equivalent to F-Droid and other FLOSS app store alternatives.

[–] isleofmist@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

The apps are not the main privacy issue, the OS is.

[–] greensand@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, Google and Apple each have their own preferences in breaching the user's privacy. Like, Google loves targeted ads while Apple wishes to know your location whenever

[–] Hondolor@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

"librem5" am I a joke to you

[–] ziproot@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Compared to Android? Not really if you're willing to harden it or install a custom ROM like DivestOS. By default? Maybe, but right to repair is an issue.

Maemo Leste (Mobile version of Devuan) is better than both.