@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.
Through the HEROES Act specifically which was a pretty dumb way to do it.
But still, how the hell did they have standing? Wtf? I have no idea how I'm going to budget these with how rampant inflation has been.
The legal basis was always a little shaky. The majority opinion actually coyly cites Pelosi stating that actual cancellation would require an act of Congress. The standing issue seems pretty severe and will likely have some messy ramifications going forward.
The (very) sight silver lining is that this is itself deflationary, not that that's much solace.
The legal standing was not as shaky as news media keeps telling people. The Secretary of Education has the right to modify or waive loans. Roberts acknowledged this right, but claimed that partial loan forgiveness is neither of these things, when it's kind of both.
SC basically just making any old shit up to justify whatever right wing position they want nowadays. Something needs to be done.
We must uncancel PPP loans. Make those leeches pay us back.
We must uncancel PPP loans. Make those leeches pay us back.