this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
90 points (100.0% liked)

solarpunk memes

108 readers
1 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aprilmay@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nuclear is the only one that can actually satisfy base load demand, we don't have enough batteries in the world to make up for solar and wind. Nuclear is also the safest.

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nuclear is safer than solar and wind? That doesn't sound right

[–] Umbrias 4 points 1 year ago

Vibes are the best way to tackle existential threats.

Nuclear is ridiculously safe. I mean that literally. No other industry is as safe and has as many regulations and as much oversight as nuclear power, largely unfounded.

Personally I'd prefer other industries get safer though to make up the gap.

[–] Five@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 year ago

With a better worldwide energy grid, I'd like to think geothermal could be a contender too.

[–] nikscha@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nuclear waste sucks!

BUT: We already have about 60 years worth of it, and we need to find a long term storage solution regardless.

And assuming we would double the amount of nuclear waste, then it would only take one additional half-time to decay.

Go nuclear!

[–] Tavarin@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Spent fuel rod reactors are well into development, and they will be able to use that waste to generate power and leave behind non-radioactive materials.

[–] nikscha@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes that's true but that's also not the point. The point is that we already have a problem and making it twice the size doesn't make it twice as bad

[–] Tavarin@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It will take quite a while to double our spent fuel rods, and once we start using them for fuel we can tackle the rods faster than we produce them.

In the meantime underground storage works just fine without harming people or the environment much.

[–] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Replace solar with another nuclear reactor.

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

OP what have you done ? You woke them up !

Now all the pro nuclear are going to comment under your post explaining why nuclear is better than hydro.

Also, even though hydroelectricity is amazing I think we already have dams on most of the suitable areas. There is not much room left for expansion.

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The confusing bit: solar is (thermo)nuclear - but we with our mirrors and panels are just a side effect of solar energy. A peculiar flavour of biomass created by the reactor, so to say. :P