this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
27 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

82 readers
5 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sounds like the guardian wanted to get rid of him for a while. Apparently he has been involved in antisemitism incidents in the past. They don't need the controversy he brings.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OrlandoDoom@feddit.uk 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The description of the comic didn't sound anti-semetic, unless there's some anti semetic trope that I'm unaware of. Being against the state of Israel, apartheid, ethno-states and genetic cleansing of Palestinians isn't anti-semetic. Self surgery with boxing gloves actually seems rather apt imagery.

There's no mention of past anti-semetism in the article either as far as I can see, something about Tories which I don't quite understand the reference, nose rings? Is that a trope I don't understand?

Help me out here.

[–] HipPriest@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

I mean I always found his cartoons annoyingly unfunny but I don't think there's anti-Semitism in this one. The general state of newspaper political cartoons actually being funny is pretty pathetic, they're still about as good as The Day Today's physical cartoonist Brandt.

But back on topic I it certainly looks like there's no grounds for anti-Semitism for this one.

[–] TQuid 14 points 1 year ago

Sounds like a crock of shit to me.

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The Daily Mail has helpfully republished the cartoon to report on the story. Link to image, not the paper

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

And the Lyndon B Johnson cartoon referenced.

I can see the issue as it's not Johnson operating on himself.

[–] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Criticizing hardcore Zionism isn't anti-semitic. Equating Jewish people with these genocidal maniacs is though.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

This alone doesn't seem bad. I can only assume the guardian had a growing file on him and this image tipped them over the edge.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 5 points 1 year ago

He could always sue The Guardian for libel; that’s the traditional way of clearing one’s name in England.

[–] jtb@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Perhaps he can get a job at the Daily Mail.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12636545/cartoonist-steve-bell-refuses-apologist-anti-Semitic-Netanyahu-sketch.html

The Guardian was started by Unitarians who are supposed to be open to ideas, but now it fully embraces cancel culture and censorship, like any orthodoxy.

[–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fucking lol. Say more things, I've still got popcorn left.

[–] jtb@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Take it to a witch-burning.

[–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ah, a conservative favorite. No thanks, I'm not in to mindless cruelty like right-wingers.

[–] jtb@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Careful with that pitchfork, Eugene. Free speech is a civil liberty, not right wing.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/civil-liberty

[–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah and it's within everyone's free speech to say they don't wanna platform you any more. Whine more.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ooof. Very brave of you to say this. RIP your inbox.

[–] jtb@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

That's how far democracy has gone down the drain, that even criticising cancel culture is 'brave'.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Long-serving Guardian cartoonist Steve Bell has been sacked by the newspaper in a row over a drawing he created of Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu.

Bell said the cartoon was spiked after a phone call from the paper suggested it may reference Shakespeare's Shylock's "pound of flesh" line.

Moneylender Shylock, from Shakespeare's Merchant of Venice, is considered to be one of the most notorious Jewish stereotypes in English literature due to his greedy nature.

Bell told the BBC that the interpretation by the Guardian "made no sense to me, as there is no reference to that play in my cartoon, which shows Netanyahu, poised to perform a surgical operation on himself while wearing boxing gloves, the catastrophic consequences of which are yet to be seen.

The issue has arisen during a time of heightened tension following the Hamas attacks on Israel earlier this month and the subsequent retaliatory strikes on Gaza.

In the same year, senior Conservative MP Sajid Javid tweeted that Bell's cartoon - depicting former Home Secretary Priti Patel and ex-Prime Minister Boris Johnson as bulls with rings through their noses - was "incredibly offensive".


The original article contains 475 words, the summary contains 186 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!