this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
104 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

217 readers
9 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CoderKat@lemm.ee 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honestly, I don't know what the lawmakers expected. The bill is dumb. It'd be perfectly fine to require payment for copying a substantial amount of a new article (eg, if they want to prevent google from offering a public cache that gets around paywalls). But the bill outright requires paying to link to Canadian news sites in search results. That's outright madness.

Y'all can hate google and meta all you want. That's totally fine. I encourage you to use competing search engines (it's bad that Google has a near monopoly). But this bill is a bad bill.

The folks on this site might know about alternatives, but the average person doesn't. When the average person can't find Canadian news sites on Google, they're not going to switch to duck duck go or whatever. They're going to just use a non Canadian site. This bill is going to hurt Canadian news companies and it's disappointing to see people cheering it on because you're happier to see Google and meta hurt than you are sorry to see Canadian news sites hurt...

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah the scraping content is the issue, not the linking. So this bill is pretty stupidly formed. They can simple require google/meta only provide line, title and max 250 letters abstract/trimmed first paragraph(excluding space and punctuation.)

They(Canadian medias) want the traffic to their site so they can display sponsor ads or sell subscriptions.

[–] lungdart@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I believe the meta data of the links are scrapped from the meta tags in the header of the site. The info you see before clicking a link was configured by the host for that purpose.

[–] illidian@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Exactly. I’m not sure what lawmakers were expecting. Don’t Canadian news sites make money off of ads and traffic to their site? Why would they require special treatment and compensation for merely linking to their news sites and articles?

[–] chocodum@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Might I suggest accessing daily newspapers and magazines electronically with PressReader? You can do so for free (or tax dollars you are already paying lol) using your local public library card, if they are subscribed to this service.


With your library card:

Visit PressReader.com and click "Sign in". A pop-up labelled "Welcome to PressReader" will appear.

Click the blue "Library or Group" button on the lower left side of the pop-up. A longer pop-up labelled "Select Library" will appear.

Click "Search Libraries and Groups" and type in your city or local public library's name. A list of matching results will automatically appear as you type.

Click your library in the list of results. A new pop-up labelled "Library or Group Sign In" will appear.

If there are text fields for your Library card number and PIN, fill those in and click on the checkbox next to "I agree to allowing PressReader to verify and exchange my registration with my public library." Then click the green "Log In" button at the bottom.

If the new pop-up simply has a green "Sign in" button underneath your library's name, click it to be redirected to your local library's website to log in.


Unfortunately, not every public library can afford to subscribe to this service. Also, some libraries do not show up on the PressReader.com "Search Libraries and Groups" list even if they do have access available via their own website. If these instructions do not work, please visit your local public library website or branch for additional information or assistance.

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Can PressReader give me daily notifications on my phone with news articles that are relevant to me?

[–] chocodum@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Great question!

The services I can think of that allow full-access aren't quite as easy to use as Google News at this time, but here is what I have come up with:

PressReader has a "For You" page that can show you top stories based on reader engagement from any of their publications. You can also create a PressReader account free-of-charge to follow specific publications, sections, journalists and interests.

Another service I would recommend to receive notifications is Canadian Newsstream by ProQuest. This service is a regularly-updated database of news stories from most major newspapers in Canada.

Note that licensing agreements restrict some publications' stories from being uploaded to Newsstream for one or two days, so I would recommend using this in addition to PressReader, which is more current.

You can use Newsstream to search for stories using highly-specific search queries, and request to be sent scheduled email or RSS alerts for any new query results once they are uploaded into the database.


PressReader "For You" Page

Once you have logged in to PressReader.com using your library card:

In the top left corner of PressReader, click "For You". The page will change. (Note that it may take a few minutes to load if the service is very busy.)

On the left side, there will be a menu with the following:

  1. "Language & Region", where you can select a country and language you would like to see top stories with;
  2. "For You", with top stories about different topics based on the Language & Region you chose;
  3. "Following", where you can see stories from your selected publications, newspaper sections, interests and journalists; and
  4. "Saved Searches", where you can save keyword searches to see if there are any new updates.
    Β 

Note that 3. "Following" and 4. "Saved Searches" require a free PressReader account in addition to your public library access authorization. You can register for one by clicking the green "Sign up" button on the top right corner of the page after you have signed in through your public library.


ProQuest Canadian Newsstream

Your best bet to access this service is through your local public library's website. If they have it, you will most likely find a link to log into it in the "news" or "newspaper" section of the site's "digital collections", "digital library", or "bibliothèque numérique" page.

Once logged in, you will be at Canadian Newsstream's "Basic Search" page. You can begin keyword searching in the text field, or click "Advanced Search" underneath the main "Canadian Newsstream" header for more options.

Visit the ProQuest LibGuides for more information and instructions on creating library database search queries.

Once you have run your search, you will be at the results page. Here, you can edit your search query and change the filter settings on the left-side menu. Consider this a preview of the kind of stories you can choose to receive email notifications for.

When you are happy with the kind of results you see, click "Save search/alert" on the top right of the page just underneath the search bar. A drop-down menu will appear.

In the drop-down menu, click "Create alert" for email notifications, or "Create RSS feed" for a personalized feed you can add to your RSS reader. A pop-up will appear.

Follow the instructions in the pop-up, and you will be notified of new articles that match your search via email or RSS.

I would suggest keeping a different alert for each topic you want to follow. This will make it easier to cancel or adjust just one topic as you need to.

You can also create a free ProQuest My Research account so you can view and manage all your alerts all at once.


These steps are quite a bit more involved than simple Googling, but you get complete control over what you are searching for. The fact that you get to decide these small granular search parameters means that there are no secret algorithms deciding for you.

Thank you again for your attention. If you have any questions about using these services, I would encourage you to contact your local public library, where the staff will be able to assist you better.

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you for providing this information.

[–] mack7400@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

And thank you for thanking them.

[–] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Can you please write a Lemmy bot that scrapes from PressReader and publishes links here?

[–] CostcoFanboy@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The amount of people that don't understand how important a news propagator like Google is is mind-blowing. Access to information is a right. This beats this right down to a pulp.

"HURR DURR GOOGLE BAD HUE HUE GOOD RIDDANCE HUE HUE I'M LE INTELLECTUAL"

Really sad. This fucked every news org. Hard. Except the big ones that own everything.

[–] dkbg@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why should Google have control over the propagation of news? Everyone can still go to the individual news organisations' website...yes Google consolidated everything into one portal, but maybe it's time to go back to something less centralised, which isn't under the control of a single corporate entity, i.e. the way the web was originally intended to work.

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same reason you're using Lemmy and don't just go to browse every single individual website on the internet.

[–] dkbg@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So then we need a non-corporate portal for news. Centralising the power of information distribution with massive companies that are driven solely by profit is not the way.

[–] CostcoFanboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I can't wait to trust the feds that can't even work out their stupid CRA website with being a source of reliable news aggregation. Just last year I SAW someone else's tax reports on my account.

If you want to go on full /r/communism about Google, there's a subreddit for that. But giving the finger to Canadians and internet freedom just because you hate Google is wack. City Nouvelles is not getting a dime from this bill.

Google doesn't control the news as you tried to imply in another comment. That's ridiculous. People that use Google made the choice to use Google for their news. Just like you chose Lemmy, some choose Meta, others choose Reddit, MSN, Yahoo, Bing, etc.

All this does is kill independent news sources and cutting choices from Canadians for the profit of the few rich corps in Canada. It's a pure money grab.

[–] dkbg@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who said anything about the government stepping in to take over? I certainly didn't say that. Something like Lemmy (and the Fediverse in general) isn't government controlled, in fact it isn't controlled by any one entity, which is one of its strengths. If you're looking for a possible alternative to corporate or government control of media, you're using one right now.

The problem is that Google has become a defacto default for most people. That didn't happen just because people "decided" to start using it, the decision was made for them because Google has a great deal of money and power and can use that influence to essentially make the decision for people.

[–] CostcoFanboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm convinced you're trolling or genuinely really dumb.

I'm off, enjoy your monologue rants.

[–] dkbg@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Strange reaction, no need for the personal attack. Enjoy your day.

[–] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

They will eventually pay. This is similar to Australia.

The world wide web was meant to be more than a few tech bros with their tentacles on everything pulling it all towards a central point that is themselves. They're fighting for their monopoly here more than anything else. It's time for them to quit stifling innovation so the internet can evolve again.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Greedy google doing greedy google things.

[–] AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Greedy old news companies thinking they should be paid every time google displays a link or one of us posts to social media.. THe way the bill is structured links to news sites posted HERE on lemmy.ca may make lemmy.ca responsible for paying for them to the old news companies.

It's a bad law.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] eltimablo@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] eltimablo@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And the comment responding to it did a wonderful job of rebutting your point, so I won't repeat it.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It didn't actually. It is fascinating to find so many pro-authoritarian pro-billionaire tech fascist accounts on Lemmy.

[–] BuoyantCitrus@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just because we want thoughtful regulation does not mean we support Meta and Alphabet. Why is this fascinating or surprising? Do you think the EFF is a huge fan of link taxes or Facebook?

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

They have had years to change and thoughtfully regulate themselves and refused. These fascist billionaire companies profit by sowing chaos in our democracy and pushing propaganda into our population without even paying taxes. To hell with Meta and Alphabet.

[–] eltimablo@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

That's a whole lot of assumptions you're making about me there, all because I said there are problems with a law. I guess Lemmy isn't all that different from reddit after all.

[–] Kichae@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

It did no such thing. The commenter doesn't even seem to be aware that "Lemmy" isn't a place or organization.

Lemmy is 1000 independent websites, run by 1000 different independent individuals. And no single website running Lemmy will be in a position to wield influence over news media organizations.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

Use DuckDuckGo #BoycottGoogle

I, for one, welcome this opportunity to spend more time on my local papers' websites.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

OH NO!

Anyway...

[–] Album@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

It's a joke that Google calls this drivel news anyway. Good riddance.

[–] CkrnkFrnchMn@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The worst thing about Google to me is their grab on Android. Yes granted many software companies will not divulge the coding behind their apps but still. No way should Google have that much monopoly on an OS. You would think we would have learned our lesson with Microsoft but apparently not. I have de-google my life as much as possible and am starting to realize just how big Google Android ecosystem is. So...all that to say that yes...every thing that Google loses I'm all for it.

[–] illidian@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Apple enters the walled garden chat…

[–] dkbg@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The core of Android is actually open source...if you install an aftermarket Android ROM like Lineage OS, you can avoid the closed source Google components (for the most part).

[–] blindsight 3 points 1 year ago

Graphene OS is amazing, if you're degoogled. Terrible if you need Google, though.

I tried it and loved it until I tried to get my work Google account working, lol.

LineageOS is a good option if you still need Google on your phone since you can install GApps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] varsock@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

am I understanding it correctly that if I'm in Canada and search for, say ArsTechnica, or other news source, Google will not show those results to me? Like they indexed the site and will omit it from a search?

Or are they pulling news in their "cards" or whatever they call them when they show previews and users never enter the site. Havent used Google Search in so long don't even know what shenanigans they are up to.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As I understand it, they are pulling all links to Canadian news sources from search and from their cards, Google News, etc. So if you search for Canadian news you will not find it, unless international news organizations report it, and neither will you find world news reported by Canadian news channels and newspapers.

It might still be possible to use Google to search for Canadian news if you use a VPN and pretend to be in another country, especially if you do it from a browser that's not logged in to your account.

[–] varsock@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm having a hard time believing that is the case for "search." Cards and "google news" is another story.

As much as I dislike Google's practices, they are doing a service by indexing where websites are and allowing them to be found based on keywords.

I feel if I go to "google.com" and search for Google should show me links to so that I can visit the site directly. Any law that retards that is shooting Canadian news outlets in the foot.

Now if Google somehow finds what you're looking for and does not take me directly to the website and instead parses the site, presents the content, and shows its own ads, as opposed to ads hosted on , then yeah - google can go play in traffic.

[–] jinarched@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I use TOR.

Oh? You are a pirate? Or maybe a journalist in an authoritarian country perhaps?

Nah, I use it to read the news.

[–] GenericUser@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This a calculated move, but on the part of the Federal government, not google. It's not about CanCon or newspapers and news sites/networks being paid for their linked content, it's about slowly eliminating access to information that the federal government doesn't control

[–] Bondjimbond@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's nonsense. You think the federal government want people to be getting their information from Twitter and Facebook?

This was a case of bad legislation pushed by short-sighted lobbyists. That's it.

[–] Tastyzero 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right. There's no grand convoy conspiracy here. Just out of touch politicians legislating stuff they don't understand.

[–] blindsight 2 points 1 year ago

More like out-of-touch media moguls using regulatory capture, lobbying, and corruption to push their policy ideas.

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It's more about eliminating access to information controlled by foreign governments, if anything

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί