this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
58 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

1253 readers
98 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So been moving around a lot with browsers, waterfox, librewolf and very recently degoogle chromium, figured id look at Firefox and holy theres less than half the option in setting then there were afew years back but I gotta say the biggest sin is that adding custom search engine is obfuscated, and the chooses of engines are google, bing, duckduckgo and fucking Amazon! Wtf is that about? But anyway all these search engines are pretty awful including duckduckgo but beyond that the browser scene is a joke, mullvad are about the only company I feel compatible with using now

Edit: instead of saying how easy it is to add custom search engines, I'd like to know why the "add search engine" feature in settings is gone?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] westyvw@lemm.ee 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What? Settings: search for search. Change default. Click find more search engines. It offers hundreds of them.

This was not hard, nor obfuscated.

[–] squid@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've reinstalled Firefox to test this and followed your direction. I can't see anymore search engines than previously stated

[–] westyvw@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Right there where it says Find More Search Engines:.

Or the other way, go to on any site, click the search bar and the option to add it as a search appears at the bottom of the search bar: https://i.imgur.com/c3bFc7g.png

I went to the Quant website, and then it offered for me to add it as a search, hence the + symbol. Or click the settings button to "Find more search engines".

I will admit that having to browse through Firefox extensions is not as easy, but the ability to add an engine at any time, without even using settings, simply by visiting the web page is pretty simple.

Edit: I didnt find it hard at all, using the keyword search in the settings menu. But they also have a guide: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/add-or-remove-search-engine-firefox#w_add-search-engines

[–] sounddrill@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This also works with Searx/ng!

[–] westyvw@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Searx/ng

Do you pick your instance and then add it, or does it let you differentiate between them?

it's treated as a different search site

[–] squid@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Addons, I would avoid as they make it easier to fingerprints and also its the long way around, if all I want to do is add a URL like google.com or bing then why should I add an extension

[–] westyvw@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Perhaps it is easier for them to have search engines offer their services through that avenue?

But it doesnt matter, if you go to any site that has search, all you have to do is click the + "add search engine" right in the address bar. Doesnt get much easier.

Even sites like Shodan work.

[–] squid@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But it was much easier lol and logical

[–] HidingCat@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

To you maybe. I don't remember the URL search strings of every search engine, so the method of adding a search engine via the page of the search itself is far easier.

[–] s20@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are you talking about?

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/add-or-remove-search-engine-firefox#w_add-a-search-engine-from-the-address-bar

That took me like two second to find. You can also use addons, like this one for Qwant:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/qwantcom-for-firefox/?utm_source=addons.mozilla.org&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=search

Which I like. But none of this is hard or "obfuscated", and it's literally identical to changing or adding a new search engine on Waterfox.

I have a lot of issues with Mozilla, not least of which is their reliance on Google for income. It's like hiring a dingo as a babysitter. But c'mon, man.

[–] squid@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay so I remember when in setting I could just add search engines, why remove that feature? Why not have the add from search bar as well as in settings?

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That doesn't make sense? How would you have the "add from search bar" feature in the settings screen?

It's a context specific method of adding a search engine - you add it when you're at the site. Meanwhile the setting screen is global for the browser.

[–] squid@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry I miss typed, would it make sense to of left the custom search engine option in settings whilst also adding the ad from search bar option?

[–] s20@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe. But even if that was the case, the way it is now isn't obfuscated. It's not difficult. It's not hard to find out how to do it. You made a big long post to complain about an "obfuscated" feature that I found in under a minute.

Next time, either do a search or ask for help, instead of whinging like a n00b. Or worse, some kind of Google FUD-spreading parasite.

FFS, Jesus Wept. I finally understand those blokes over at FreeBSD telling me to RTFM twenty years ago.

Edit: Apparently, the synonym for complain I used before was offensive. It was not the "B" word, which I only use in reference to female dogs. Just wanted that to be clear.

[–] squid@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago (8 children)

Part of the vocal few, most people seem to agree that googles relationship to Mozilla is negative, and it doesn't matter that you'd find the answer by searching for it, what does matter is that there was a perfectly adequate solution that is now gone for no rhyme or reason, and not one person here has said why removing the option is beneficial but what ever, this conversation has become petty and I don't care for the direction you've taken

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] BananaTrifleViolin@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am confused by this post, there are 4 ways to add search engines to Firefox:

  1. From the settings page via "add search engine" button, to pick on from the Firefox add-ons site. This is the "main" route for most users as it ensures you're adding links from a trusted source (so you won't add a fake version of a popular search engine by accident that scrapes your data).

  2. Via the address bar. Any website that supports OpenSearch can be added by right clicking the address bar and selecting "add search engine name".

  3. Via the Mycroft project website, where almost any search engine in the directory can be added to Firefox.

  4. Via bookmarks and keywords. This is slightly more involved but almost any engine can be added this way.

Android Firefox offers slightly different routes but again any search engine can be added. It is a bit more involved though.

Firefox includes certain search engines by default as it gets revenue from the search engine providers for doing so, and Mozilla is transparent about this. Although Mozilla is independent, the Google search engine deal remains one of its biggest sources of income. That's how it survives.

The default add-ons site meanwhile is a compromise between security and convenience for the majority of users, but people are not locked in to it and other search providers are not locked out of it.

The Mullvad browser is modified Firefox btw, as is the Tor Browser it is itself based off. I don't know how much either contribute to the Mozilla foundation. Tor is an open source project but Mullvad is a commercial enterprise.

[–] squid@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago

And why the hell would I use an add-on for a web address? My point is that the search engine feature is gone from settings

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Generally speaking, I’ve noticed that, for inexperienced users and beginners, the settings pages/windows/tabs for many web browsers aren’t very… friendly. They’re designed mostly for advanced users and users who are already accustomed to their design/layout.

The one exception to this would be Safari, which is designed to be far more accessible, but most advanced users dislike using it for this reason (and a few other novel UX decisions).

[–] squid@feddit.uk 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The obfuscation of default search engine is predatory is more of what I'm getting at

Also no, setting page is not for advanced users, about:config is

[–] dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean Firefox is mostly funded by a deal with Google to have them as the default engine. I don't like it but I understand why it is the way it is.

[–] squid@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Yep its a sorry state of affairs and ass backwards way to circumvent anti trust laws.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, I agree with you re: obfuscation of changing the default search engine. That’s crappy.

I was speaking in a general sense of FF’s and most popular browsers' settings pages’/panels’ UX design, not trying to impugn your own ability to find the setting. Apologies if it came off that way.

[–] tio@social.trom.tf 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@squid True...Harder now to add a custom search engine unless you visit it and then click the url on top to get a dropdown to add it...but manually adding it is hard.

Speaking of search engines I highly recommend searx.neocities.org/ - it randomly uses the best Searx instances. No ads, no tracking...

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis@feddit.ch 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] tio@social.trom.tf 2 points 1 year ago

@sic_semper_tyrannis Oh nice! I'll have a deeper look. Thx

[–] squid@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've heard of searx never used it though

[–] tio@social.trom.tf 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@squid I use it daily. We ran an instance too. It is simply great. As good as Google, DDG, and the like are, since it is using them.

[–] squid@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So its an agitator, will it directly communicate with googelz bing ddg? Or does it use an IP hiding techniques?

[–] tio@social.trom.tf 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@squid

Searx does not share users' IP addresses or search history with the search engines from which it gathers results.

- read more here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Searx and see the source code here github.com/searxng/searxng

[–] smallaubergine@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd love to try using it more. How do you add it to Firefox?

[–] tio@social.trom.tf 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@smallaubergine @squid

https://searx.neocities.org/ most search engines get recognized in Firefox. Simply visit the link then right click the url and you should see a menu entry like: Add Searx as your search engine.

[–] smallaubergine@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Thank you! I guess I should have mentioned I'm on mobile. But it was pretty easy to add manually once I read the directions

[–] ducking_donuts@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure why you get downvoted so heavily, I have also found that adding a custom search engine is unnecessary hard in Firefox these days.

There is a way to get the “add” button back in the settings described here: https://superuser.com/a/1756774

[–] squid@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Never kick an underdog even if the underdog is directly funded by google, I should imagine google had a large part to play in these changes. But anyway thanks for the link

I've also come off and confrontational with my stance, its hard not to be when a large portion of replys have been dancing around the stated issue of senseless removal of a key setting

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago
[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/add-or-remove-search-engine-firefox

But I also agree that they really need better defaults in that list, while adding more isn't complex, most people are going to either use the default, or just pick from the dropdown of defaults which are bad.

[–] Scraft161@iusearchlinux.fyi 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Go to the site, right click on the url bar and at the bottom there's the option.

Any site that implements open search can be added.

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

And even if it doesn't, you can often get around that by searching for a site on The Mycroft Project to see if there's a plugin for it.

[–] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Out of curiosity, why did you say that duckduckgo was particularly awful?

[–] squid@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its an american company, so privacy be damned

[–] Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You will eventually dream to live here after the UK new bill.

[–] squid@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

I don't mean this as an us against them statement, I wouldn't use services hosted in the uk either

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

On Desktop you need "add custom search engine" an addon that creates custom engines for you. Otherwise you can only add OpenSearch ones, the ones that show up when right clicking the URL bar of a website.

load more comments
view more: next ›