this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
200 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37720 readers
35 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kagi is a paid alternative to ad-supported search engines like Google and DuckDuckGo. It has recently revised its pricing model, reducing the cost for a plan with unmetered searches from $25 per month to $10.

Kagi boasts the following (and more) features:

  • Blocking or boosting specific domains in your search results
  • "Lenses", which are individual setting profiles (e.g. region locks, domain whitelists) that can be applied to search queries
  • All of the Bangs that DuckDuckGo has (e.g. type "!yt" in front of your query to immediately search on youtube.com)
  • Universal Summarizer, which works with any website, PDF document, YouTube video and more

This blog post goes into full details about Kagi's capabilities.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chloyster 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh sick!! I was already on the $10/month plan. This is great news!!!

[–] MangoKangaroo 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Same. Looks like you and I both will be getting unlimited searches now. :D

[–] Penguincoder 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Samesies :P This is awesome. Love being a user and not the product. EDIT:

With the redirector extension you can import the following to help with muscle memory.

{
    "createdBy": "Redirector v3.5.3",
    "createdAt": "2023-09-22T00:00:00.631Z",
    "redirects": [
       {
            "description": "Google->Kagi",
            "exampleUrl": "https://www.google.com/search?q=kagi%20rocks&sca_esv=011101111&source=dv&ei=CN",
            "exampleResult": "https://kagi.com/search?q=kagi%20rocks",
            "error": null,
            "includePattern": ""^(?:https?):\\/\\/(?:www\\.)?google\\.com(\\/?$|(\\/search\\?q=.*?(?=[&])))"",
            "excludePattern": "",
            "patternDesc": "Redirect Kagi",
            "redirectUrl": "https://kagi.com$1",
            "patternType": "R",
            "processMatches": "noProcessing",
            "disabled": false,
            "grouped": false,
            "appliesTo": [
                "main_frame"
            ]
        },
    ]
}
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] snowe@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Same too! I was literally considering the update to the family plan so I could share it. This is welcome news.

Edit: I’m actually going to update to the duo plan. Super affordable now!

[–] Whimseymimple 4 points 1 year ago

We switched to Duo, too. Making that plan unlimited was the las barrier to my spouse jumping aboard the Kagi train. We're in for the yearly Duo sub as of this evening!

[–] festus@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Probably a good pricing decision. To avoid hitting the 300/month usage I kept DDG as default and only used Kagi for more complex searches. If I upgrade to this I could then keep Kagi as default.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] czech@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is fantastic. I've been a $5 Kagi user for a few months and have been really enjoying it. The only issue has been that sometimes when I'm working on a project I need to blow through a ton of similar queries to find what I'm looking for; I've been forced to switch back to google for those. Now I've upgraded and am going full Kagi.

[–] douglasg14b 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I probably come in at ~30-50 searches/day so I never really considered it. But unlimited sounds interesting 🤔

[–] menturi 15 points 1 year ago

This is awesome! I always wanted to try out Kagi but was not huge fan of the original pricing model. I think I might have to give Kagi a try now!

[–] snek_boi@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

EDIT BEINGS HERE

So I actually watched a talk by the person who coinded "enshittification", Cory Doctorow, recently, and I have changed my perspective about Kagi. I no longer think Kagi is doomed to enshittify.

Enshittification requires advertisers. As long as Kagi finances itself with money that does not come from advertisers, it will not enshittify.

This does not mean that it's not problematic that their code is closed-source.

EDIT ENDS HERE

I like what I hear about the user experience, but there are many problems I see with the service.

For one, it's based in the USA, so it is legally subject to the insane, antidemocratic, and awful state surveillance there.

It is also a corporation, so it is subject to enshittification. Currently, it is giving users loads of stuff so that users use it, but sooner or later investors will want their money back and Kagi will enshittify.

Finally, these two problems would be mitigated by open-sourcing and making libre their software. With that, alternatives in more sensible legislatures could open. Users could migrate to instances that are still libre and not enshittified.

It is really unfortunate that Kagi is doing so many things well while doing some fundamental things terribly. As it stands, Kagi is doomed to enshittify.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 12 points 1 year ago

What's wrong with simply switching as soon as enshittification starts? You're not making any permanent commitments to it.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

There is no law in the requiring data logging in the US, nor is it required to comply with FBI security data requests. This has been fought for and won in court and beat out gag orders over the subject. It is also deemed a violation of the first amendment.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mojo@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Why the hell would you pay for search when the free competitors are just better

Also it's automatically not private when it requires a login. They know exactly what user is searching what, and basically breaks search in incognito mode. Also people love more accounts to manage.

"If it's free then you're the product" isn't even true when search engines are ad supported, so stick with the much better free alternatives.

If you really want to pay while not having to login, self-host a searx instance and you'll be logging your own data. You'll have complete control, it's significantly cheaper, and it's far more private without having to even login.

[–] NotAnArdvark@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

"If it's free then you're the product" isn't even true when search engines are ad supported, so stick with the much better free alternatives.

This is exactly what "you're the product" means. Google is selling your presence on their platform to advertisers - you are the product they're selling.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] snaggen@programming.dev 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

No ads disguised as search results. Actually, no ads at all. Great search results. Lenses.

Also, there is a solution for incognito mode. And ad supported, in practice means tracked by advertisers, and hence you are the product.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dan@upvote.au 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Why the hell would you pay for search when the free competitors are just better

Providing the service is not free, especially something like search that uses a LOT of storage and compute power to index websites. That's very expensive to do. There's two options as to how to pay for it:

  1. Pay for it yourself (like what Kagi is doing)
  2. Have someone else pay for it for you. For example, advertising like what Google and Bing do

The latter is what people mean when they say "you're the product". The advertisers are the customers.

self-host a searx instance

Two totally different things.

Searx is a search engine aggregation service. It is not a search engine itself, and you still need the backend search engines to make it useful. Searx could use Kagi though.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Kagi doesn't index, it's Google results as a proxy. That's literally what Searx does, and it's free. The issues you said with needing to pay for search is solved with Searx even if you claim it doesn't, it does. Also other search engines like DDG does a crawler + bing results is funded by ads, they're profitable. The mental gymnastics to pay for a shitty service makes no sense to me, but you do you if you want to support this terrible practice. Not to mention the numerous other issues I listed that you ignored.

Searx could use Kagi though.

Lol that makes no sense, and it probably violates Kagi's ToS. You're running a self hosted proxy through a service that's just a proxy for Google results. Just set Searx to search Google for the exact same thing.

"If you aren't paying for something, you are the product" sounds nice, but isn't true. Advertisment can exist and you can still not the product.

Instead it somehow makes more sense to pay for a privacy invasive search engine that requires a login, requires cookies, and doesn't work in private search.

[–] abaci@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] mojo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Typically every search query on Kagi will call a number of different sources at the same time, all with the purpose of bringing the best possible search results to the user.

But most importantly, we are known for our unique results, coming from our web index (internal name - Teclis) and news index (internal name - TinyGem). Kagi's indexes provide unique results that help you discover non-commercial websites and "small web" discussions surrounding a particular topic.

They just proxy searches and then sort them lol. Definitely caching thrown in there too, as if that even changes anything. You're paying $10/mo for that when DDG does the same thing for free.

[–] abaci@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It says right there they have their own index, that they are pulling from Google et Al and also their own. Whether it's worth $10, I dunno. But it sounds like more than just an aggregator

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mnglw 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

what search engines are actually good these days?

because that's the problem, they aren't

search results have gone down a sharp hill lately

I don't think Kagi is the answer, but there is a problem - a big one

[–] beefcat 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why the hell would you pay for search when the free competitors are just better

They aren't, that is why.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sculd 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Does Kagi support languages outside of English? One issue I have with DDG is the lack of results outside English sites. If Kagi is similar then it would be a big issue.

[–] koorool@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

It sea4ches in different languages, but there is no way to force language of the results. Instead, ot tries to be "smart" and uses languages of the region. So it has the same problem Google and Bing does: giving you results in random languages outside of language region (or in multi-lingual regions), even when request is explicitly in language A.

There is a feature request to implement this setting, but not much hope to have this soon.

On this note, if someone knows of a search engine that allows specifying language of results, please let me know :)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] b9chomps 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Does anyone have experience with non-english searches? Are the results of similar quality?

[–] MangoKangaroo 4 points 1 year ago

@sculd asked the same question further down and got a couple of good responses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Serz 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Awesome! The AI summarizer is very useful, and it gives quality search results from my experience with the free trial. $10 a month still seems a little high for a search engine, though I'm definitely eyeing it more now...

Hopefully we see more competition in the future with paid search engines, this seems to be new territory where everyone is still pretty unsure of the right pricing. I think $5 a month is going to be the sweet spot for me.

[–] baggins 8 points 1 year ago

Same here. I did the trial 300 search thing and was very happy with that. Settling on the fiver a month plan as I can't justify a tenner. Plus I realised that I don't do much more than about 300 searches.

It's so refreshing to not have 'sponsored' posts or adverts in front of your results.

[–] Crotaro 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's a curious project and I hope they succeed. But I have to wonder. On their "Why pay for search engines" page, they state the following:

Our proposed price is dictated by the fact that search itself has a non-zero cost. In fact, it costs us about $1 to process 80 searches (wherever in the world you search from). So a user searching 8 times a day would perform about 240 searches a month, costing us $3 in search cost. But an average Kagi user is actually searching about 30 times a day. At USD $10/month, the price does not even cover our cost for average use.

So, will they dial the price back up or do they currently just hope that most people pay for the "unlimited searches per month" plan but use it less than an average user would?

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 17 points 1 year ago

They probably haven't updated the page. This blog post says:

With new search sources proving more cost-efficient, the improved efficiency of our infrastructure, and the broader market embracing Kagi, we can again offer an unlimited experience to a broader group of users.

So it sounds like they have made lots of efficiencies to make it cheaper per search. I'm sure more subscribers helps as well.

But I'm really curious about the "new search sources" part. Where do they source their searches from?

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Their operations are very small scale still. I imagine as the economy of scale does its thing, that price/search will fall drastically.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 601error@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Just heard of this service but I am signing up first thing tomorrow.

[–] thejevans@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Yesss! Immediately upgraded to duo unlimited for me and my partner.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm intrigued, but I don't want to login to a search engine :/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fwygon 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why on earth would I pay $10 a month for search when I can get everything I need using SearXNG? For Free.

It costs me exactly $0.00 to run SearXNG locally using Podman and WSL to host the docker image. It Just Works; and I don't have to worry about paying money every month to anyone; nor do I ever have to count my search queries as precious.

Unfortunately this "$10/month = Unlimited" is also likely to be available only for a limited time; and once Kagi feels it has enough users; then you'll be stuck back on some arbitrary number of searches each month.

Worse is logging in. To search. Yuck.

There are so many "Public" SearXNG instances as well for the less-than-technical; https://searx.space/

All of them provide the option(s) to use whatever engines you'd like.

[–] beefcat 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kagi has better search results than any other engine I've used. That is why people pay for it.

[–] fwygon 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No it doesn't. SearXNG aggregates all engines anyways; and that gets far more helpful results.

[–] douglasg14b 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is literally "nuh uh" quality discussion. We get it, you like SearXNG, are you actually trying Kagi?

I just tried a few SearXNG instances and the quality is the same as what I get from Google or Bing anyways.

Trying out Kagi now to see if it's better or not.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net 6 points 1 year ago

Ah this is fantastic! I've only been using Kagi for a few months, and have been concerned about running into the search limit, but this means I can go and set it as the default everywhere now.

[–] Madiator2011@lm.madiator.cloud 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That is actually great thing for now was using you.com might finally move

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ransom@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

Hadn’t heard of this but stoked to try it out!

[–] MoonRaven@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

Hmm I hope this one will live on. I remember Neeva which never let their users know that they could sign up and then shut down because they didn't have enough income..

load more comments
view more: next ›