Politics

10177 readers

20 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Socialism

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Indiana attorney general sues hospital system over privacy of Ohio girl who traveled for abortion (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 1 year ago by trashhalo to c/politics

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Indiana Attorney General sued Indiana University Health, the state's largest hospital system, claiming it violated patient privacy laws in the case of a 10-year-old Ohio girl who received an abortion in Indiana. Attorney General Todd Rokita has taken repeated legal actions targeting the doctor who discussed the girl's case publicly. The lawsuit says the hospital prioritized protecting the doctor over patient privacy. It alleges the hospital violated both HIPAA and an Indiana law by not keeping the girl's information private. While the medical board reprimanded the doctor for not following privacy protocols, Rokita had sought a suspension of her license. The hospital argues the doctor did not break any laws. Notably, a 28-year-old man was sentenced to life in prison for raping the 10-year-old girl, highlighting the severity of the situation that sparked the national abortion debate.

top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] RickRussell_CA 20 points 1 year ago

There's also a strong argument that the Indiana licensing board that censured Dr. Bernard were activists who were bowing to public pressure. Many external authorities who reviewed Dr. Bernard's case do not believe that she committed any unethical disclosure.

https://www.statnews.com/2023/06/01/caitlin-bernard-indiana-abortion-10-year-old-advocacy/

https://www.npr.org/2023/06/03/1179941247/abortion-caitlin-bernard-indiana-doctor-medical-board

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summary

The lawsuit, filed Friday in Indianapolis federal court, marked Attorney General Todd Rokita’s latest attempt to seek disciplinary legal action against Dr. Caitlin Bernard.

Rokita, a Republican, is stridently anti-abortion and Indiana was the first state to approve abortion restrictions after the court’s decision.

It alleged the hospital system violated HIPAA, the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, and a state law for not protecting the patient’s information.

Indiana’s medical licensing board reprimanded Bernard in May, saying she didn’t abide by privacy laws by talking publicly about the girl’s treatment.

Still, the board’s decision received widespread criticism from medical groups and others who called it a move to intimidate doctors.

“We continue to be disappointed the Indiana Attorney General’s office persists in putting the state’s limited resources toward this matter,” IU Health said in a statement.

Saved 57% of original text.

[–] Can_Utility 1 points 1 year ago

Looks like Indiana AG Todd Rokita is in some trouble of his own regarding comments made concerning this case. Womp, as the kids say, womp.

Some grade A irony here:

The third count alleges that Rokita violated confidentiality requirements in Indiana law by making public statements about an investigation into Bernard prior to filing a complaint with the Medical Licensing Board, which he did in November.

LOL