this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
107 points (100.0% liked)

Green - An environmentalist community

204 readers
1 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!


RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith


Related communities:


Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cutting down on billionaires would do a lot more for the environment

[–] CubbyTustard@reddthat.com 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

seriously let's fucking send all the jets and motor yachts to the bin before we start telling the common man things are his fucking fault

[–] laenurd@lemmy.lemist.de 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Both things can be true at the same time.

Billionaires / the 1% / whatever category of rich assholes you choose obviously use much more resources than "the common man". Still, if we, as humanity, do not change how and what we consume, cutting what the rich use would not even remotely be enough.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I've been a vegan for 17 years and I can tell you one thing Americans don't give a shit. They well not eat less meat. They don't give a fuck that they are killing the planet and they sure as fuck don't want you to tell them that. I've traveled over seas quite a bit and I see people from other countries seem genuinely interested in veganism but Americans don't give a fuck and give even less of a fuck when you tell them you're a vegan.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've got you even better. For the past 15 years I haven't used a car to commute, and man do vegans NOT like the fact that their aesthetic lifestyle choice is meaningless compared to reliance on fossil fuels. Other countries have policies that genuinely reduce car culture, but holy fuck as soon as you suggest not living in the suburbs, vegans are up in arms about how America is just too big for such a thing to be possible.

[–] appel@whiskers.bim.boats 2 points 1 year ago

So I just do both???

[–] PeachMan@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Realistically, pushing veganism is simply a bad choice in America. Instead, we should be pushing a simple reduction in meat consumption. Just educate people and encourage them to REDUCE meat in their diet.

  • Take away the government subsidies that make our meat artificially cheap, doing that alone will naturally raise meat prices and lower the average person's meat intake.

  • Consider throwing a carbon tax on the types of meat with the greatest environmental impact, why not?

  • If we want to be more equitable we could only tax the "luxury" meats (like goose, veal, lamb, oysters, or expensive beef cuts that are usually only purchased by upper class people anyway).

There are a lot of ways to skin this cat (lol), and I think we've sufficiently demonstrated that most Americans are WAY too resistant to cutting all meat out of their diet.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not interested in veganism but I am interested (and practicing) massive reductionism, near vegetarianism.

I think that sliding scale of reduced meat consumption is the ONLY move that can be made. (Surprise? Lol)

Americans will accept reduced meat as alternatives are around, but it needs to be a "here's a new fun thing" not a "stop doing that"

[–] rocaverde@todon.nl 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@blindbunny @inasaba they're indeed driving global warming to the extreme with their cattle ranches and ignorance. They have a lack of education since primary school, most of them have no idea what evolution is, much less would they know what carbon emissions are!

ps. America is not a country but a Continent. It might be ok to call it like that within its limits, but we're in an international platform here, so please...

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago

For real. The disinformation starts with pushing children to consume dairy in all kinds of products, raw as well as processed, and claiming that it's good for your health. It all goes downhill from there.

[–] Indyraps@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

I reduce my meat intake but I'm not going to act holier than though and pretend it has anything to do animals.

When you tell me you're vegan you're telling me that's your identity as a person and no one wants to listen to you after that. It has nothing to do with what veganism is.

[–] skellener@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Shooting for 0% even better.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I cut my meat by 75% can I keep my dairy at only a 25% cut? I need cheese more than meat.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

You can do anything you want, and any non-zero improvement is still an improvement. It's far better if everyone dropped their meat consumption by a third than a small number of people completely dropped it.

The perfect shouldn't be the enemy of the good.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

While I agree land use matters to a degree, beef is a much worse producer of CO2 per KG of food consumed compared to cheese, or even 'dairy' like people think of as eggs and milk.

There's been a lot of disingenuous greenwashing around here lately for absolutely no reason. Here's the actual Nature study.

What can you as a consumer genuinely do that WILL make a difference? Vote progressive or as left as you can which will actually win. Research and invest in new technologies that help with lab meats and alternatives.

Everything else is just helping your conscience, treat it as such. Not as some little blow to big AG. They're the ones investing in these alternatives anyway lol. You're patting yourself on the back for giving your money to the same dude in a trenchcoat vs coveralls. Every little bit helps in a wave, but unless they hit tipping points, then understand the real reason why you're doing the things you do. It's to let you sleep easier at night, which is a good thing to strive for.

Since I'm lazy I'm just going to repost my comment from last time.

You can see from the graphs that the smaller animals don't matter. It's per kg of consumed food per kg of CO2.

That also means that meats which are more nutrient rich and bioavailable are often as good as plant alternatives. This only gets better with time and eventual lab grown alternatives.

Altering diets for husbandry has made huge strides in lowering emissions too.

Vegans can Doomer emissions as much as they want to but it's already solved lol. The market will get there just like every other green intiative because turns out people and money DOES care about the future.

The biggest issue with eating meat currently is their shit poor living conditions and treatment. Even separating calves early for dairy isn't nearly as bad for yields as people previously thought too. Like any industry it takes time to make change.

https://www.businessinsider.com/the-top-10-foods-with-the-biggest-environmental-footprint-2015-9

https://www.eenews.net/articles/changing-cows-diets-could-curb-emissions-will-farmers-dig-in/

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jun/29/mums-ask-when-cows-and-their-calves-separated-rise-ethical-milk-vegan

[–] sadreality@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Right after rich people quit flying around on jets...