this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
52 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

789 readers
3 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is this some sort of a convenience feature hidden behind a paywall to justify purchasing their subscriptions or does generating the codes actually cost money? If the latter is the case, how do applications like Aegis do it free of cost?

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 43 points 1 year ago

It's a convenience feature upsell, the calculations happen locally.

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That's just an excuse to charge more. TOTP is standardized in RFC 6238 and cost nothing to generate.

[–] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 4 points 1 year ago

On top of that, it takes no more than 5 lines of Python code to generate

[–] flumph@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The "Product Led Growth" crowd doesn't care about charging based on what things cost. They only care about what the buyer will tolerate. The "value metric" that pisses me off the most is per user pricing when the service doesn't incur costs per user.

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago

The “value metric” that pisses me off the most is per user pricing when the service doesn’t incur costs per user.

Even in cases where there is a cost per user (or there is at least a correlation in cost increase with number of users) the price is usually many orders of magnitude larger than the cost increase.

[–] nakal@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

TIL password managers charge for 2FA.

  1. Get a free password manager.
  2. Get a free 2FA App. Please don't mix passwords and 2FA so you don't reduce it to 1FA.

For 1) I use PasswdSafe, because I can merge databases with Password Gorilla as I like.

For 2) I use Aegis. You can download an icon theme, which is quite cool.

[–] hh93@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For the 2nd point:

Mixing it doesn't reduce it to 1fa - it still makes your accounts immune to Passwort leaks and common attacks

You are only at a 1FA level if someone hacked your PW-Manager but in that instance you're most likely fucked anyway

Sure for the most important accounts having 2FA in another app is good so you can at least secure those if the PW-Safe leaked but I have 2FA on every single website I use(d) that offers it - even if I'm only on there once a year so using a special app is less important than just having the additional security in the first place

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 7 points 1 year ago

I usually call it 1,5FA since it is reduced to one factor, namely the password manager, but that password manager is protected by 2FA.

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago

You are only at a 1FA level if someone hacked your PW-Manager but in that instance you’re most likely fucked anyway

As long as you at least have actual, separate 2FA for access to your recovery email(s) you should be more or less fine.

Unless you mean that if your password manager is compromised it probably means that your device is compromised, which also means that you're probably also a victim to a session hijack for the recovery email(s), in which case you are truly fucked.

You can also have a multi-level approach where for "higher value" accounts you have a separate password database so the more valuable accounts aren't exposed as much as everything else... There are definitely options.

[–] ddnomad@infosec.pub 22 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Please don’t use your password manager for TOTP tokens. It is called two factor authentication for a reason.

[–] beeb@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The reason that 2fa exists is not to protect you if someone gets their hands on your device. It's to protect you if your "static" credentials leaked from a providers' database or you otherwise got phished. Using a password manager to handle mfa is totally reasonable.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

If you are really worried about the password manager being an intrusion vector, secure your vault with a hardware key.

[–] danileonis@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Agree. That's another reason to always suggest KeePass!

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

There are other ways your password database could leak. For example you could use a weak password, or it could leak in some way, and if you store it on a cloud service that also got compromised you'd be fucked without a compromised device.

But yeah, all these are much less likely.

[–] ddnomad@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is reasonable yet subpar under a threat model where you do not trust any single provider, which is a model I find appropriate most of the time.

[–] PrincipleOfCharity@0v0.social 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I feel like this needs to be pushed back on a little bit. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of the good. Having a password manager that provides good passwords and TOTP as a second factor is way better than only using a password.

Sure, it would be nice if you had two devices. A phone password manager and a usb security key, but for many people it is inconvenient to carry a security key to plug when you need it. I’d rather that person keep a TOTP on their phone in that case rather than not use two factor due to inconvenience.

Your concern is mostly about “what if someone steals your phone or computer” then they have both factors. However, your average person isn’t getting hacked by someone they know, and random local thieves aren’t typically sophisticated enough to do more than re-sell stolen computer equipment. The average person is getting hacked by some dude in a foreign country who dumped a password database or phished a password. That person isn’t stealing your device so the fact that both factors are in the same place doesn’t really mean anything.

Also, most password managers are locked by biometrics these days. In that case, it isn’t really the app that is the second factor. It is your fingerprint or face. Someone may steal your device, but if they can’t get into the password manager that needs a password and biometrics then they don’t have anything.

[–] ddnomad@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

You should not assume your password manager is unhackable.

That’s my main point. Perfect is an enemy of good indeed, but I feel that doing things properly the first time is a good idea in general, especially when it as easy as using a different app for your TOTP tokens. It’s a low hanging fruit really.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] authed@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I do that mainly for accounts I don't care about but either way it does increase security as compared to just a password in many cases..... I just wish that some of these services didn't require TOTP

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] danileonis@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

It's free on KeePass, use syncthing to have personal libre cloud.

[–] IanAtCambio@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Keepassxc and macpass do it for free

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 10 points 1 year ago

If your password manager is charging for that get a new manager as almost all managers will do that for free

[–] nIi7WJVZwktT4Ze@fost.hu 4 points 1 year ago

It's completely open and it's just another fee you can pay. Switch to KeePass if you want restriction-free password management.

[–] Vexz@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you like Bitwarden you might wanna search for a publicly hosted Vaultwarden instance that accepts user registrations. You'll get Bitwarden with its full premium feature set.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not 100% on board with that idea. There is no guarantee the server is not tampered. Unless you know and trust the host, Bitwarden premium is very affordable and Vaultwarden can be hosted even on free VPS. Or you can even use a KeePass fork (I'm not up to date as to what the best ones are) with any form of online sync.

[–] elia169@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

KeePassXC (windows/macos/linux), KeePassDX (android) are what I use. I sync the databases between 4 devices with Syncthing.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the info! I'm a happy Bitwarden subscriber, but it's good to know.

[–] authed@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What's the best free VPS? I pay about $15 per year for mine... But its good enough to run woocommerce/wordpress for a small store

[–] Vexz@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Well, yes, I agree on that. Just wanted to name another option in case that's okay for the OP. I host my own instance on my private NAS and I absolutely love it. :)

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you are willing to host something yourself you might as well selfhost Nextcloud and use KeePass(XC) with it.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Keepassxc doesn't