this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
125 points (100.0% liked)

Science

147 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on scientific discoveries, research, and theories across various fields, including physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, and more. Whether you are a scientist, a science enthusiast, or simply curious about the world around us, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on a wide range of scientific topics. From the latest breakthroughs to historical discoveries and ongoing research, this category covers a wide range of topics related to science.

founded 1 year ago
 

an ecosystem predicted to collapse in the 2090s owing to the creeping rise of a single source of stress, such as global temperatures, could, in a worst-case scenario, collapse in the 2030s once we factor in other issues like extreme rainfall, pollution, or a sudden spike in natural resource use.

There is no way to restore collapsed ecosystems within any reasonable timeframe. There are no ecological bailouts. In the financial vernacular, we will just have to take the hit.

Paper

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShesDayDreaming@kbin.social 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I study environmental science and I can believe it, every model I've used all the sources I've used that predict have been conservative in numbers compared to what's going on.

The problem is we are never going to do what needs to be done because capitalism is the literal cause and the world is addicted to capitalism because none of the companies are going to do what they need to do unless it's profitable.

[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

It's greed or commercialism. Capitalism is synonymous to them in popular discussions, but even if you picked a non-capitalist stance like communism, they'd produce greenhouse gas anyway.

[–] LostCause@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Since we’re all here looking at yet another terrifying headline. I have a huge grudge for companies who force people into the office. It‘s unnecessary!! There should be a legislation in all countries ASAP to give workers a right to WFH they can enforce on the company!

We have seen with the pandemic it‘s possible and would free a lot of people from this pathologic need for a car and yet the companies owners and paid for politicians are dragging their feet to save their fucking "office real estate investments" or other bullshit reasons that all amount to control. Elon fucking Musk personally pisses me off the most, cause he pretended to care about the climate to sell cars and then is the absolute worst about this calling WFH "not real work", also to sell cars.

Don‘t even get me started on their private jets and pleasure yachts, all this unnecessary bullshit, there is already a first class the rich assholes can sit down in with extra space, they don‘t need their own plane!!

Assholes like that should be shamed everywhere they go for daring to do something so damaging while also forcing people to rely on cars cause of the hostile infrastructure and hostile work environments they created!

Governments are so good at making up crimes out of nowhere, see how effective they are at fucking over trans people for something as innocent as changing their own gender, maybe use that power for good for ONCE and criminalise environmental damage??

[–] Sodis@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

The amount of anti-WFH propaganda in recent times is completely ridiculous. All just to protect their books from falling office real estate prices.

[–] discodoubloon@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I’m starting to see car abusers as a serious fucking problem. Burning dinosaur juice just for going somewhere for your own aims? I have never seen so many selfish people that don’t give a fuck. You’re going to kill us all.

It’s not full ecosystem collapse that’s going to kill us. I bet about 20% of the way there life will become untenable. There is no way that it’s not exponential progress. It will hit us like lightning.

[–] argv_minus_one 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Everybody focuses on cars and completely ignores everything else fossil fuels are used for and everything that's being done to stop alternatives from replacing them. Those in charge are trying to shift the blame onto powerless non-rich people like you, and you're letting them get away with it.

[–] TisBe@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yup. Most plastics are made from the waste product of fuel production. It is the combination of burning and plastic trash that is causing the acceleration. It is fuel to make and transport goods, and the plastics to protect those goods in transit, that are collapsing our environment.

[–] argv_minus_one 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

And there, too, alternatives are being blocked. When's the last time you heard of a solar-powered cargo ship or freight train? Where are all the bioplastics?

[–] Charlielx@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

pretty sure both of those are energy density issues that need to be solved rather than suppression specifically

[–] Lells@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

...or for that matter, when is the first time? Cuz... I haven't.

[–] lootgoblin42@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oil doesn’t come from dinosaurs. Just sayin..

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

The more accurate description perhaps paints the problem better - millions of years of fossilized sunlight. How do you begin to reverse that, and quickly? You don't.

[–] Igloojoe@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We already seen the crab ecosystem by alaska collapse. Overfishing and warmer waters killed most of them off.

[–] FarFarAway@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

While your probably right, technically, i dont think they ever found the bodies, as you would expect with a large die off.

My optimistic side wants to believe they relocated...but I suppose either way, it still means thier environment collapsed.

[–] wave_walnut@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Since climate change figures are a collection of waveforms with short cycles and high amplitude, it is possible that the conditions for a comfortable living environment for humankind could be exceeded temporarily at any moment. And even a temporary exceedance of the allowable value will surely result in loss of human life.

[–] gonzo0815@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

A couple of years ago i saw a world map with predictions about water scarcity and was kind of relieved Germany was classified as "low risk" (or something like that).

Currently farmers are complaining about too little precipitation and predict lower grain yields for this year. It's fucking scary.

[–] Lells@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

My parents don't believe in climate change because of their religion, which means they will NEVER change their minds.

"Well, the earth is only about 6000 years old, so all those numbers are meaningless because they're based on false assumptions...."

I tried telling them, "You believe in God, well, he gave you a brain, don't you think he wanted you to use it and maybe not take a couple thousand year old story so literally?" They weren't happy.

load more comments
view more: next ›