this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
285 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

430 readers
1 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While it sounds good on paper, in practice, they've screwed it up. They're putting the new speed limits in place on every 30mph road in Wales before they've put the public transport alternatives in place.

There's currently no reason for someone to switch to public transport, especially if the buses are going to be stuck at the same speed as the cars, but stopping regularly too. Our roads are too narrow to install bus lanes, and barely have enough room for single file traffic through lots of the towns and villages. The trains are being upgraded, but that's not scheduled to finish until at least next year, and at the moment they're slow and very unreliable. It feels like every week the trains are cancelled and an inadequate replacement bus service is put on.

I'm disabled, and have to travel from my town, Aberdare, to the main hospital in Cardiff, UHW, on a regular basis. If I had to leave now, it would take 42 minutes by car, or 2 hours and 6 minutes by public transport. The shortest journey is tomorrow morning and would take 1 hour and 31 minutes, more than double the time of the car journey. The closest inpatient hospital is 22 minutes by car, or over an hour by public transport. The difference the new speed limits are going to make is negligible compared to how slow public transport is here.

All this is going to do is annoy and upset people, and turn them off the idea of using public transport, and push a lot of people towards voting for the parties who were against this. Out of the main parties, that mainly seems to be the Conservatives, so that's going to be bad for all of us.

[–] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The FAQ in OP's link tells you that it is not all 30mph roads, but rather all restricted roads, with a link to a map of all 30mph roads that are staying 30mph as well as the option to see which restricted roads will change to 20mph. "Restricted Roads" is a classification of roads in law that is defined by the lamppost density, so this change won't affect larger and more rural roads where lampposts are more sparse.

[–] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Then they've screwed up the marketing. Everything they've been pushing out makes it appear that it's all roads. Not that there's much of a difference. There's a grand total of two roads in my area, and five in the Aberdare area that will apparently stay as 30mph.

[–] ByteWizard@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

All this is going to do is annoy and upset people, and turn them off the idea of using public transport, and push a lot of people towards voting for the parties who were against this.

Bingo. But they don't care who they hurt in the process. "Fuck cars = fuck lives"

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I wish my neighborhood would do this. 25mph feels really fast on my street. I usually hover around 15-20 when I'm not paying attention to my speed.

Edit: I am surprised that this was my third most controversial comment since I've joined

[–] theplanlessman@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's been surprising to see just how many pro-car users seem to lurk on these anti-car/pro-alternative transport communities.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

They're probably imagining me as that Prius or something slowing them down in traffic. My neighborhood is basically one lane when people are parked, and there are a lot of kids, so if they drove the road they'd understand.

[–] FleetingTit@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Fuck cars is regularly in my "everything" feed. And most of these measures aim to reduce traffic, which ultimately benefits the remaining car drivers.

[–] ScotinDub@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

Amazing news, can imagine how much quieter Wales will become as a result of this

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's cool. One of the advantages of lower speed limits is that while they slightly improve safety, they massively improve the perception of safety. When people feel safe walking and cycling, they're more likely to do it. So, lower speed limits decrease the subjective desire to drive, and thereby reduce car dependency.

[–] mrpants@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you have numbers on this?

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

I saw a study a long time ago, but I'm afraid I can't find it now! I think it was UK-based, possibly by TfL or the DfT.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Wouldn't this, in the end, make cars have to shift to a lower gear, thus keeping about the same RPM, and thus eating about the same amount of fuel, which results in about the same volume of the sound produced by the car?

This feels like a terrible fix.

[–] aZeppelin@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

afaik most of the sound comes from the tires, not necessarily the engine or the exhaust. obviously not the case for every car, but for most commuter cars it is. the faster the tires are rolling, the louder the sound.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

i think at higher speeds the wheel and road noise drowns out the engine noise, but at lower speeds its the engine, especially during acceletation.
in the region of 20-30mph i'd think the engine is probably the louder part.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Wouldn’t this, in the end, make cars have to shift to a lower gear, thus keeping about the same RPM, and thus eating about the same amount of fuel

That's not how cars work, they definitely don't use the same fuel in different gears at the same RPM. See this Wikipedia article for a discussion of speed vs fuel economy.

And as pointed out by the the FAQ, that's doesn't not factor in acceleration:

Will driving at 20mph mean I use more fuel?

No. Fuel consumption is mainly influenced by the way we drive – driving at a consistent speed is better than stopping and starting. Accelerating up to 30mph can take twice as much energy as speeding up to 20mph.

A default 20 mph limit and a smooth driving style, can help avoid unnecessary speeding up and slowing down, saving fuel.

[–] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Most cars, at least in NA, have excessively large engines. It is crazy that we use 2L engines to carry one person around, when their own legs would suffice.

[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lot of cars can cruise at 20-25mph just idling in Drive, foot completely off both gas and brake. The RPMs don't get much lower than that.

[–] cambriakilgannon 2 points 1 year ago

My forester, when the engine is cold, will idle at about 25 mph :v, it calms down once it's warm, but still. I wouldn't be driving around with my foot on the brake

[–] oo1@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

if the cars are designed to use the same fuel for less useful output power, then they're very badly designed.
i'm sure they might be less efficient in terms of miles per gallon. but they surely can't be so bad as to waste absolutely more fuel at lower speeds.

if they are, fuck them.

[–] bermuda 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People have a misconception that cars waste more fuel at lower speeds, but it's really due to where the lower speeds are happening. Fuel is mostly wasted due to constant stopping and acceleration, like in a city environment with traffic lights and stop signs. On a highway, it's actually more efficient because you aren't stopping so often.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] comfisofa@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This will hopefully ensure less people get hit by cars when the fights inevitably break out on the roads near pubs after Wales lose to Fiji and Australia and exit in the group stage of the Rugby World Cup this month

[–] Serpent@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Name@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Make cars use more gas by having operate at speeds they aren't meant to operate at constantly. Check.

Make people sit in cars longer resulting in longer commutes and more pollution. Check.

Claim that some number printed on a sign magically saves lives. Check.

Do literally anything to actually address the issue at hand. Not check.

[–] CurtAdams@urbanists.social 2 points 1 year ago

@Name @Tywele Strict speed limits save lives. Lots of lives. Hoboken NJ has a speed limit of 20mph and it hasn't had a traffic death in years.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Also way to make money from the shitload of speeding tickets lol

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Welsh parliament has passed a law bringing down the speed limit on all residential roads and busy streets to 20 mph (30 km/h).

Wales will introduce a default speed limit of 20 mph (30 km/h) in built-up areas from next year, in a bid to lower road collisions and noise pollution, as well as encourage people to walk or cycle.

The Welsh parliament voted on Tuesday to back the plan, which will bring down the speed limit currently set at 30 mph (50 km/h) on most busy streets and residential roads.

Both Labour and Plaid Cymru, who have a cooperation agreement and hold almost three-quarters of the 60 Senedd seats, backed the plan, but it has been met with criticism too.

Reasons for opposing the scheme ranged from concerns it could “annoy” drivers to an increase in journey time and congestion.

“They are quite rightly very concerned as they believe that pollution is increasing because cars have to drive in a lower gear and wait longer at traffic lights, there have also been more accidents,” he said.


The original article contains 609 words, the summary contains 178 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago

It could “annoy drivers”? Believe me, so many things do.
Also, it’s very likely that due to lower speeds, less congestion will happen and so, travel time will actually be shorter.

[–] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

good on them for using real units of measurement for their speed limits.

[–] Adirondack@toad.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@Tywele

MPH or KPH?

For 🚲 🚲 🚲 too? 😀

[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Mph. It says so right in the title

[–] FleetingTit@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, for bicycles too. But there is no mechanism to enforce speed limits for them.