this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
886 points (100.0% liked)

Asshole Design

39 readers
1 users here now

Nothing comes before profit -- especially not the consumer.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's over the line.

[–] quackers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Nope, they just moved the line a bit further, like they always do

[–] timkenhan@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

This is why you read the licence agreement, people!

[–] Sordid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

As if I needed any more reasons to avoid their craptacular browser like the plague that it is.

[–] catreadingabook@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is kind of amusing actually. Imagine a program that gives you a ton of bookmarks to legally questionable websites, like how that other website (used to?) automatically spam incriminating Google searches into your search history. Then watch the auto-bookmark-moderator suck it all up like a roomba.

[–] jetsetdorito@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

chrome can E2E encrypt your bookmarks, I didn't realize it wasn't used by default

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

E2E encryption is only (potentially) effective if the threat is a MITM. If your threat model shows any possibility for your threats to be on either end, it is effectively useless.

Now I'm not saying that you should model Chrome as a threat, but I'm certainly saying that you also can't be certain you don't need to. The whole thing is closed source, the publisher is a Machiavellian megacorporation; and if I were Google, and had to spy on users for profit, that's certainly where I'd start. You know, as anonymized metrics, to "help improving Chrome".

Edit: oh and, I haven't checked what they mean by that, but potentially, the E2EE is meant in the context of the transit only, meaning the data at rest is not encrypted, on your computer, or on the Google servers.

[–] jetsetdorito@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

under "keep your info private", this is different than encrypted in transit. I mean I guess they could be lying 🤷‍♂️

https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/165139

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jeebus@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These MOFO's have really REALLY jumped the shark.

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Jumped the shark? They've chopped it up and turned it into sushi.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›