this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
144 points (100.0% liked)

Android

407 readers
1 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kae@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 year ago

This is an overall win. The upward pressure is good for everyone, as phones have passed the meteoric rise of speed. Devices have been able to last far longer than their update cycle for a few years now.

[–] ArtificialLink@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Cool do the same for the rest.

[–] captainsiscold@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

My thoughts on it: cool, now give it a headphone jack again and I might buy it.

I'm not buying a phone that requires $100 wireless earbud DLC (which honestly feel like just another thing to become e-waste in a few years when the battery gives out).

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

My soundcore wireless headphones have lasted longer than any pair of wired headphones I've ever had. Going on 4 years now and just as good as the day I bought them. They were only $70 too. Not saying you're wrong but there's reasonably priced quality ones out there if you look

[–] darkkite@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

my wired headphones are going strong since 2012

[–] ArtificialLink@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Got a pair of wired headphones from the 90's lol batteries in wireless would long be dead

[–] Piers 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you spend $70 on your wired headphones though? Or are you comparing the durability of cheap crap wired headphones to decent value budget wireless headphones? I have both a pair of Soundcore wireless headphones and a couple of pairs of wired headphones at home that all cost around the same amount and I'm certain I could smash the Soundcore headphones into tiny pieces using the wired ones and the wired ones would still work fine.

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I spent $30-40 a few times on some wired headphones. This was around 10 or so years ago so, what 50/55 in today money? Maybe more. They'd last me 8 months to a year instead of the 3 or 4 from the cheap ones but eventually the wire at the buds or the aux plug would wear out from being shoved in my pocket, bag, etc. For everyday use I prefer wireless. I have a nice turntable, amp, and speakers for when I want to listen at home. Headphones are exclusively an "on the go" thing for me and my several years old set of BT headphones do the trick just fine

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Second to soundcore. I got the soundcore life Q10 and love them several years later.

You realize dlc stands for downloadable content, right?

[–] cheery_coffee@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Just buy a dongle, they’re cheap and the audio quality is better than most cheap DACs phones used to have.

I get that it’s stupid and annoying, but what isn’t in 2033.

[–] darkkite@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you can still use an adapter.

I did on my T-Mobile g1. the first android phone

[–] bug@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know the removal of established standards that people use is a bad thing, but I don't know why people still pretend wireless headphones are suddenly the only option like this is all a conspiracy to sell planned-obsolescence tech and track everyone via Bluetooth. Adapters might not be ideal in every situation or for every use-case but don't pretend most people can't just leave one attached to the end of their headphones!

[–] captainsiscold@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair enough, adapters do exist, but as you point out, there are situations where that is not ideal. On a long flight, for example, where I might want to charge my phone and also listen to something, or (in my case) someone who does some amateur audio engineering work on the side, where having the ability to simply wire in a device to play some audio is a big plus. My biggest problem is that phones from five years ago could do both wireless and wired headphones just fine, no adapters needed. What have we gained as consumers by the loss of one of those options?

[–] bug@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

I think regularly taking long flights and tinkering with audio equipment are both niche enough use-cases to justify looking for phones that cater to your niche (I.e. have a headphone jack). As for why that is now niche, you often hear suggestions of improved waterproofing and/or more internal space for other things (or being thinner).

[–] Honza368@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago

It would be cool if they backported the promise. But I don't expect it, honestly.

[–] Welp_im_damned@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago

I mean they did that with the og pixel. Idk why they wouldn't do that with the 6 and 7?

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 20 points 1 year ago

Yes please do the bare minimum

[–] Extrasvhx9he@lemmy.today 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wait I'm confused are they going to up it to 8 years now for the 8th gen or is the number of years still up to debate? Either way not bad especially if they keep their current practices of being repairable and third party os friendly

[–] foo@programming.dev 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Extrasvhx9he@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah my fault kinda skimmed it

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One can dream. Also, given the upcoming EU regulations around replaceable batteries, they may have some work done around this area too. That would be essential for a device with long term support.

[–] spacedogroy@feddit.uk 11 points 1 year ago

Would have loved to see this for my 4A but glad they're looking to extend the support window moving forward. Many phones now are powerful enough to go years past their obsolescence date and chucking them away is just e-waste.

[–] Mio@feddit.nu 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Only 3 years of OS updates, then you need a new phone. Give 5 years directly so you can start thinking about competing with iOS. What is the problem? They have control of the software and the hardware like Apple.

[–] SlikPikker@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The 'problem' is that supporting 'old' hardware won't net them the same high profit margins to which they've grown accustomed.

[–] Mio@feddit.nu 2 points 1 year ago

Not really true because Apple can do it, higher margins and support OS much longer. The problem is how they design their OS and the amount of work required. Just look at how long time Windows support all hardware. It is possible, all is just software. They just need to take the hugh upfront cost of the software development that can even help other vendors and suddenly you can do a lot of about the big OS fragmentation problem. You want your latest OS to run on like 90% of all devices. Today, I guess that number is down to like 15%.

[–] The_Mixer_Dude@lemmus.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You say that 5 years is needed to compete with iPhone but Android is 4 years ahead of iOS so effectively your net result after 3 years is still further forward than iOS after 5

[–] Mio@feddit.nu 1 points 1 year ago

No, you need to look at OS API level which gets updated every OS. App developers just assume that based on age that they will no longer support older devices.

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also is that 3 years from the first day they sell one or 3 years from the last day they sell one?

[–] Mio@feddit.nu 3 points 1 year ago

First day they sell one.

[–] IdleSheep@lemdro.id 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With how terrible my P7P update experience has been (literally every update has made the phone buggier and more unstable) I'm no longer sure if this is a good thing or not. Maybe if they fix their insane QA issues.

[–] gvasco@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] IdleSheep@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm switching phones instead, but even if I wasn't I don't want to risk bricking my phone or playing the cat and mouse game with banking apps.

Either way I'm never touching a pixel again until they fix their buggy software.

[–] gvasco@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's almost no risk, you can install it from the browser, the bootloader gets relocked so no issues with banking apps and rooted device, and you can still have play services on the phone but without it being able to access the whole storage and device info. You seem to literally just be spewing words without knowing anything about the subject.

If you don't want it I'd be willing to take it and experiment myself with graphene OS.

[–] IdleSheep@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm saying I don't want to modify my device because I don't want to risk damaging it. How is that spewing words without knowing anything about the subject? I don't care how easy it is for other people to modify it or how functional the phone might be afterwards, I don't want to risk modifying it myself, that's all. Also I wouldn't want Graphene for other reasons, but that's besides the point. It's on Google to fix their crappy software, not me.

[–] gvasco@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Because there is practically no risk of damaging the device and bricking it. If you knew anything about the the distribution, it's inhalation and android you'd know that the risk is almost nonexistent and reversible. I understand you don't want to run any risk, sure, it's a valid reason, but to damage the device is practically impossible just from installing another android variant.

[–] Alonely0@mastodon.social 1 points 1 year ago

@gvasco @IdleSheep recently it's even slightly buggy too, but it's still orders of magnitude lower than stock.

[–] radau@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Doesn't mean much with how bad the QA and overall lifespan of Pixel devices have been unfortunately. Hopefully better this time but hard to want to put money in when the previous generations all had such issues and bad QC.

Extending warranty for the 5As then handing out equally defective devices is a pain. I'm on my 3rd one and I'm really not planning on it surviving over a year since none of the others did and when they died I was sitting down using the phone.

Only thing keeping me on them is GrapheneOS, too difficult to go back after getting a taste of it lol

[–] Apeeksiht@lemdro.id 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Pissel devices are like bad hardware plus best software experience making it mediocre at best. Idk when they'll ship good quality tensor soc. And before someone come and tell me hey i own a pissel and it's fine for me. Guess what it's not fine for me.

Here are the cons

Bad cellular reception : yes really bad on 5g. Overheats like crazy. When it overheats ui lags like hell.

[–] worfamerryman 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At least the x key works on my phone.

[–] jcarax 6 points 1 year ago
[–] Apeeksiht@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago

What s key?

[–] jcarax 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The good news is, with Pixel 8 they're supposed to start moving away from Exynos design elements. Bad news is, it's probably going to take a few years. Hopefully they replace the cellular radio sooner than later.

[–] Apeeksiht@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What i heard on pixel 9 they will make the soc in tsmc so ig pissel 8 would be like their exynos brothers.

[–] jcarax 3 points 1 year ago

Seems like every rumor pushes it back.

[–] blindsight 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm really disappointed with my Pixel 7a. It gets terrible battery life. I'm charging twice/day on a new phone with light use. Sometimes thrice/day when I'm using my phone more heavily.

With my 3a, I stopped charging at 85% to keep my battery healthy for longer and got a full day or if it for years. With this phone, I'm charging to 100% and unplugging, and waking up to a phone at < 75% charge.

I'm probably going to sell this phone and get something else. I'm getting battery anxiety.

[–] Alonely0@mastodon.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@blindsight @Apeeksiht my 6a's battery life w/ GrapheneOS is great. Not the best, but lasts a day of moderate use just fine. Days of heavy use I'll have to charge it in the late afternoon, and days of light use it's almost like I haven't unplugged it.