this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
54 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

42 readers
22 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

content: image of google "moderating" (i.e. eliminating, permanently, without apparent recourse) an entry in a user's URL collection/bookmarks. the entry is for kickasstorrents. (archive)

I recall seeing an example of them doing something like this to people's gdocs stuff (and iirc that was on paid account, but I could be misremembering). seems like they're ramping up the where to more coverage of their services/assets

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fasterandworse@awful.systems 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it was more fun when padding on a div was included in the absolute width on one browser and added to the absolute width on another.

[–] fasterandworse@awful.systems 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

FYI: the post was updated with a clarification but it sounds just as bad

https://strangeobject.space/@silvermoon82/110969122337810598

To clarify: this is a Google Save Collection, which is one of the mechanisms Google syncs bookmarks via. They're not the default in Chrome (but accessible), but they are the only bookmark facility in the Google Search app, using the standard bookmark icon.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah, I'm familiar with the mechanism, but it's still google fucking with user data under the "well, it's stored on our servers" excuse

I should see if I can find that one where goog was killing someone's stuff in their gdocs for the same reason

[–] fasterandworse@awful.systems 5 points 1 year ago

I should have said "it sounds worse", really