this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
377 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1036 readers
15 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Awesome news! Go India! 🇮🇳

[–] cloud@lazysoci.al 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Nelots@lemm.ee 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Humanity successfully landed another object safety on a celestial object hundreds of thousands of miles away from the Earth. Of course that's impressive.

Plus, they succeeded where Russia failed, which is at least mildly amusing.

[–] dRLY@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Being fair, they did land some things on the Moon before while part of the USSR. Though it is nice to see a new nation get a first for something relating to the Moon.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, this says more about India than about Russia.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 22 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Three other nations — the US, China, and the former Soviet Union — have all previously achieved a soft landing near the Moon’s equator, a safer region with (comparatively) amiable temperatures and terrain and reliable sunlight to recharge solar-powered instruments.

By contrast, much of the Moon’s southern pole is littered with deep craters and basins that are permanently shrouded in darkness.

The extreme conditions in these “cold traps” make remote observation from Earth difficult and present problems for operating sensitive equipment in the region.

The Chandrayaan-3 spacecraft took 22 days to enter the Moon’s orbit on August 5th, following its launch from the Satish Dhawan Space Centre on July 14th.

On August 17th, the Vikram lander carrying Pragyan — a lunar ground rover — successfully separated from its propulsion module in preparation for today’s soft landing.

The mission marks India’s second attempt at a lunar landing after the Chandrayaan-2 lander crashed into the Moon’s surface back in 2019.


The original article contains 307 words, the summary contains 158 words. Saved 49%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] HappyMeatbag 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Welcome to the club, India!

My only note is that you might want to get a bit more creative when choosing a name (Chandrayaan means “moon craft” or “moon vehicle” in Sanskrit).

[–] cosmic_skillet@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

So sounds like... a good name?

[–] jernej@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

I mean USA names it after moon god, Russia just calls it moon so its as creative as the rest

[–] ag_roberston_author 5 points 1 year ago

It's really no less inventive than Apollo.

[–] jay2 20 points 1 year ago

Congratulations on all your hard work India. Ride the wave. It's a great accomplishment.

[–] SpeziSuchtel@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

All of the kids are holding up pictures of an american space shuttle that isn’t even designed to land on the moon. But its good that those kids have something to look up to.

[–] Parsnip8904 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The space shuttle is very photogenic 🤷

[–] SpeziSuchtel@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

True, it was the sexiest spacecraft humanity has done so far. Now we only have flying space dicks, sometimes with some smaller space dicks attached to its sides. Quite poetic.

[–] Chriskmee@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, feels like we have taken a step back almost, we went from Apollo to shuttle and back to basically Apollo as far as overall look.

The closest thing to the shuttle that has a planned Q1 2024 launch date is Dreamchaser. It's much smaller than the shuttle and not nearly as capable, but it at least looks cooler and lands like the shuttle.

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 5 points 1 year ago

If you look closer, you can see that the space shuttle is actually riding on a giant flying space dick, with two smaller flying space dicks attached on the sides.

[–] Parsnip8904 1 points 1 year ago

True. Unfortunately it seems like the shuttle design is not as perfoment as the traditional rockets. Maybe when we have orbital platforms.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least they're not wearing NASA t-shirts.

[–] SpeziSuchtel@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Isn’t that this cool and hip fashion brand?

Congrats to India