this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
89 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37742 readers
74 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ConsciousCode 19 points 1 year ago

The EU giveth (removable batteries, mandated USB-C) and it taketh away

[–] Jummit@lemmy.one 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

violations could bring fines worth up to 6 percent of their global revenue – which could amount to billions – or even a ban from the EU.

Not too shabby! Seems like the laws at least have some teeth.

[–] ruination@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wish GDPR had the same kind of teeth.

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[–] ruination@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like common knowledge of all the shit big tech companies have pulled throughout their history is sufficient justification for giving massive fines.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No better source than Al-Jazeera?

[–] LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago

Genuinely ignorant, what wrong with Al-Jazeera? Sure, it's biased on some topics, but aren't all news sources?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] itsAllDigital@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So it's the "We can take down what we don't like"-Act

[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 34 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Oh God no, the horror that the EU could remove content that promotes hatred!

[–] x3i@lemmy.x3i.tech 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The problem is usually in the broadness of the definition. Less democratic regimes can easily use this to forbid material about opposing views and parties. Double-edged sword.

[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the problem is that social media has been used for great evil so an attempt to curb that is good.

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

At least it's a democratic body. Way better than Musk being in capricious control of deleting speech rights.

[–] lemillionsocks 9 points 1 year ago

Cant less democratic regimes do that anyway?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago

It's targetting only the biggest platforms and there is nothing in EU taking control.