this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
33 points (100.0% liked)

Meta (lemmy.one)

3 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss or ask anything about lemmy.one's instance or moderation.

For discussion about Lemmy (the software) itself, visit !lemmy@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This is being posted all over the Fediverse, and it's worth a look ourselves. Beware federating with corporate entities like Meta, because it inevitably comes with a poison pill designed to disadvantage independent actors like us.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Xirup@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago

I don’t know if those rumours have a grain of truth, if it is even possible for Meta to consider it. But there’s one thing my own experience with XMPP and OOXML taught me: if Meta joins the Fediverse, Meta will be the only one winning. In fact, reactions show that they are already winning: the Fediverse is split between blocking Meta or not. If that happens, this would mean a fragmented, frustrating two-tier fediverse with little appeal for newcomers.

Meta can eat shit, it is unbelievable that the big monopolies always have to spoil everything good.

Thanks for sharing.

[–] Farksnatcher@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago

We can't let this happen.

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago

Real shame regarding what happened with XMPP. There's no business case for a corporate entity to support a free, open communications protocol that has no path or potential to monetise.

They'll just introduce propietary features that don't support federation to move users over into their walled garden, similar to Apple's approach with iMessage.

To me the decision is clear - Meta (and other massive corporate entities reliant on monetising their users) should not be embraced by the fediverse. Project 92 in particular looks like an attempt to siphon off Mastodon market share and potential users... really doubt anything good will come out of working with them