this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
937 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

1357 readers
23 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 79 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck poachers, don't get me wrong, but fucking hell, I wish people had the same kind of energy when it came to billionaires, who are literally responsible for the deaths of millions of humans (by virtue of hoarding so many resources as well as creating and maintaining a system that relies on exploitation and suffering to benefit them and only them).

If only society cared about oppressed and marginalised people as much as it does about cute animals.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Society doesn't care about cute or endangered animals. The rangers represent a minority.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Society doesn’t care about cure or endangered animals

That's bullshit.
I'd agree that not enough people care, but significantly more people care about cute endangered animals than they do marginalised and oppressed human beings.

It doesn't take a study to see the difference in attitudes and engagement (though studies have been done, feel free to invest your own time looking them up).

The fact that you've responded to me to focus on the animals but not on the people my comment is actually about is a perfect illustration of my point.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

The fact that you’ve responded to me to focus on the animals but not on the people my comment is actually about is a perfect illustration of my point.

That's all a narrative you created in your head. Besides, many of the same solutions that would protect endangered species would also protect marginalized people. You're trying to make this into a Trolley Dilemmas for some reason. Who do you think are the ones buying dick powder made form Rhino horns?

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 52 points 1 year ago

I, for one, fully support this development.

[–] beefcat 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I did not expect so many upvoted poacher sympathizers in this thread. I am disappointed.

Poachers aren’t poor. They make assloads of money off their illegitimate trade. They have plenty of skills that could be put to profitable use elsewhere. They simply choose poaching because it is more profitable.

[–] mihor@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Poachers need to be destroyed on sight.

[–] unfnknblvbl 10 points 1 year ago
[–] Durk 38 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I mean, this is not really a solution. Poachers don't do what they do because they're greedy and hate animals, they do it because they're poor and have often no other choice but to risk their lives to make a living, and they are probably getting something like 10$ per rhino horn. This is a systematic problem perpetually reinforced by the actual people we should be shooting: the millionaires who hire the poachers. They are the ones destroying the environment, exploiting animals and people and reselling those same rhino horns for ridiculous amounts of money on the black market.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Then they should be stealing from the rich. Not killing endangered species.

And at ~ $20000 USD/kg for African and ~400000 USD/kg for Asian, and them not taking the meat. Its definitely for profit and not survival.

[–] radioactiveradio@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's simple math, if you kill animals and get caught you get one maybe up to 10 years in prison. If you kill/steal from a millionaire you get lifetime of troubles and jail and possibly put your family in danger too.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, it appears trying to kill an Asian Rhino in India is much more dangerous than robbing the rich.

Or did you miss the part that they are killing the poachers?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 year ago

Poachers don’t do what they do because they’re greedy and hate animals, they do it because they’re poor and have often no other choice but to risk their lives to make a living,

Well, they're risking their lives, they're losing them in the gamble. No one owes you winning a gamble.

This is a systematic problem perpetually reinforced by the actual people we should be shooting: the millionaires who hire the poachers

Not saying we don't, I'm all in for shooting a millionaire myself; but that doesn't detract from still needing to kill the poachers: we can't leave the reservoires and wild habitats unguarded merely to kill one or two twitter twats, so the job of millionaire killer we have to give to someone else.

Nah, we of the working class and impoverished are partly responsible for the situation we're in, because we're too busy playing the system instead of fighting back like we were supposed to be doing. The result is this: people wiping out popular and beloved species just to get crumbs from their masters. How disgusting.

[–] Marzepansion@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago

we should be shooting: the millionaires who hire the poachers

Damn, I was looking forward to eating them. :(

But you're entirely right. Obviously the poachers do the hunting, but there are people rich enough out there that put a price on rhinos to begin with, they are the real problem. They wouldn't be hunted if there was no incentive.

[–] argv_minus_one 6 points 1 year ago

ridiculous amounts of money on the black market

Exactly. These aren't impoverished farmers doing what's necessary to live in some semblance of comfort. They're greedy SOBs who don't give a rip about anything other than riches. They don't deserve sympathy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We could reduce the numbers of Nazis like this as well. All in favour?

[–] Filipdaflippa@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What if I told you that's what the Nazis did to people they didn't like..

[–] mrpants@midwest.social 15 points 1 year ago

Ohh wow you are very smart

[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Oh were not simping for Nazis on Lemmy any time soon. Twitter is that way -->

Then I'd laugh and dismiss you

Here, watch:

😄😂🤣

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

Now compare the reasons why for not liking them

[–] Jerrimu2@startrek.website 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we don’t protect the planet, it will kill us.

See: recent orca war.

[–] froghorse@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe if they had a system where people weren't so damn broke then dangerous work like poaching rhinos wouldn't be so attractive.

That would be a better way.

I mean, these guys are doing this to pay their bills because they see no better options.

[–] dansity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Poverty hardly justifies crime. It is a cause not a justification. They are still poachers doing illegal hunting for protected animal on protected land. Also poaching is rather lucrative, even if the government raises income 200% poaching will still stand out.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yes, no matter how rich you are, sleeping under a bridge is illegal and immoral ! Shoot on sight !

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] intrepid@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Poacher poachers poaching the poachers?

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, because they have a license to hunt poachers.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 3 points 1 year ago

[Bollywood version of James Bond theme song]

[–] Polymath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is important to note here how well-indoctrinated the US and Europe are to "point the finger" and absolve responsibility...

We don't refer to stuff as "deforestation," we call it "urban planning" or "development."
We don't talk about "poaching," we just accept that farmers and the agriculture industry finds natural predators inconvenient, so we allow them to kill off coyotes, foxes, mountain lions, etc.

We have just as many people doing similar, but for some reason we're only taught to lose our minds over conservation elsewhere, in the places where the US intentionally destabilizes (with Europe) to keep prices low for us. After all, it's what our economies are built upon: ruin everywhere, so we can call ourselves the heroes for killing off indigenous folks to areas just for the crime of living and wanting things to feel fair.

Check yourself. This isn't "the way"

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well, that's naive and misinformed. And also irrelevant; endangered species are too important to the environment for poor people to justify killing them off to buy food. Poor people have agency and therefore responsibility for their actions too. Your stance is both anti-environment and anti-working class.

We can and should help the poor in ways that don't involve absolving them of responsibility for driving endangered species extinct.

[–] SpiderShoeCult@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago

Well articulated. We can't absolve people of responsibility just because they are poor, unless we absolve them of all responsibity and treat them like children, and put the ones who have no caregivers in a foster care system. I'm fairly certain nobody wants that.

Yes, I am aware poverty is not something you can just wish away, but they know what they're doing. Same as the people illegally cutting down forests in Eastern Europe. They're also poor but they're also assholes. They also have a penchant for shooting people who try to stop them. Pretty sure them rhino poachers would do bad stuff to anybody getting in their way as well.

[–] stewie3128@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

This would become my full-time job if I ever became independently wealthy.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

no, fuck murder.

Don't get me wrong, fuck poachers, but murder is never the solution, it just breeds escalated violence.

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

Murder is bad, but humans are the problem. And humans being stupid chaotic creatures, it often devolves in to dirty things like killing. You can say all you want about right and wrong but this is a messy situation and this is the solution they have been forced in to using, after trying the peaceful method for years

[–] psud@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

It's not murder, it's legal punishment. The poachers use gun violence against rangers, so it's a reasonable escalation.

That's a terrible and quite frankly untrue take

[–] knobpolisher@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago

Reverse poacher rhino bbq birthing

[–] masquenox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eco-fascists unite, huh?

How long do any of you idiots upvoting this think it'll be until these (so-called) "rangers" start selling rhino horn themselves? That is... if they haven't already and this is really just them clearing out the competition?

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're telling on yourself with all that projection...

[–] masquenox@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. You are. This meme demonstrates how easily first-worlders will slavishly applaud fascist terrorism in the third-world as long as you wrap it up in green capitalism first.

The only thing these privatised death-squads you call "rangers" are doing is waging unrestricted warfare on impoverished brown people while (at best) doing absolutely nothing to hinder the mass-slaughter of wild life or (at worst) simply monopolizing it for their own profit - but you get your "eco-friendly" revenge-porn in exchange, so everything's cool, right?

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I actually don't disagree with your general point, but the idea (and the fact that your fist thought was) that the rangers will turn around and start poaching rhinos themselves seems like a really odd argument to be making if your aim is the capitalists who create and uphold the industry in the first place.

E: like, you focusing on the rangers is exactly the same as other people focusing on the poachers - neither are in charge and both are there making money for people who would never get their hands dirty.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

that the rangers will turn around and start poaching rhinos themselves

None of this is difficult to understand - it's no different than the right-wing death squads the US trained to fight their little "War On Drugs" suddenly and not-so-mysteriously ending up the biggest players in the drug-smuggling business.

Who did you think these "rangers" work for? They are pigs - that's what they are. And like all pigs, profiting from the illegal things they are (supposedly) "preventing" is merely one of the unspoken but universal perks of the job. As long as their violence serves the capitalists that wants to exclusively loot and pillage natural resources, everybody in power will turn a blind eye. And it's not just the trade in animal parts - don't be surprised when it's discovered that these privatized goon squads being lauded in the media for their (supposed) "anti-poaching" activities take their orders from multi-national mining corporations or companies that want to exploit local populations as cheap labor.

[–] Little8Lost@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh no, thin weapon dilivery* accidentally shipped to india instead of sending it to us school kids
* i know it is wrong but i dont know how to fix it

[–] explodicle@local106.com 3 points 1 year ago

It's fixed with "delivery" and "I would rather discuss a wildly different topic".

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Could this method be used to reduce illegal homelessness too ?

[–] psud@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Death penalty for being poor? Psychopath.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›