this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
120 points (100.0% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

127 readers
2 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zksmk@sopuli.xyz 59 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Antineutrinos don't interact with almost anything. They're just a bunch of wimps. They're harmless. Neat for mapping nuclear reactors tho.

[–] shortwizard@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

informative but the name-calling was uncalled for

[–] hansl@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

GenX scientists naming things. Was it a mistake? Maybe, but we’re having a laugh.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

How is the map data obtained?

Edit: Looked up the article. It seems they took known geological data and calculated the geo-antineutrino flux map based on measurements from detectors in Japan and Italy. Reactor antineutrinos are calculated from the international atomic energy agency data and assumptions on antineutrino rates.

In short, this is just a distance-from-nuclear reactors map

[–] Denvil@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago
[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

I suspect using satellites

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Could these be used to locate nuclear submarines and the like?

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No. This is a map of estimated antineutrino rates generated from known data.

Data from a theoretical detector that can calculate where its detected neutrinos came from from could be compared to this to find anomalies, but we're not there yet

[–] zaplachi@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Probably not, unless the military is hiding some next level tech.

For example, the current generation of detectors, nearly all of which weigh upwards of a ton, have to be placed within tens of meters of a reactor’s core—inside a facility’s fence.

https://physics.aps.org/articles/v13/36

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

are you saying we're making dark matter here on earth

[–] zksmk@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a good question, but no. It was just a bit of word play.

Antineutrinos are not WIMPs. WIMPs are weakly interacting massive particles. Antineutrinos are anything but massive, they're almost massless, so massless that they were, for the longest time, thought to be massless. They can be a product of dark matter, as speculated, but they aren't it tho.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah I thought so. I guess you could call them WILPs instead (Weakly Interacting Light Particles).

[–] remer@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Very cool. I can see my workplace on this map.