this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
915 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

1357 readers
15 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] radostin04@pawb.social 109 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Inaccurate meme - the white and red RCAs in composite typically don't actually carry the left and right channels - usually, the white one is L+R, meaning both the left and right channels combined into one, and the red one is L-R, the difference between the right and left channels.

This is done so that a mono television, which will only have a yellow and white port, will still be able to hear both audio channels, as opposed to having to completely miss out on one of them

[–] Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 year ago

Wow, Til I guess. Never ever thought that this is what actually it is for.

[–] heftig 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you have a source for this? AFAICT this is untrue. Mono audio using just the white connector exists, but this depends on configuration and does not make the red connector a difference signal.

[–] radostin04@pawb.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I swear that I've seen it mentioned somewhere, but you are entirely right that I can't find a source. Maybe it was some weird device I used a long time ago? Regardless, sorry for not doing my research before posting

[–] orsetto 1 points 1 year ago

The signal in fm radio works like you described. Poor fm, declassified to just some weird device :(

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 4 points 1 year ago

Oh, they did the same with stereo radio.

[–] argv_minus_one 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

VGA was so much better.

The composite video output commonly seen on 1980s microcomputers couldn't display high-resolution text without severe distortion making the text unreadable. This could be seen on the IBM PCjr, for example, where the digital RGB display it came with could display 80×25 text mode just fine, but if you connected a composite video display (i.e. a TV) instead, 80×25 text was a blurry, illegible mess. The digital video output was severely limited in color depth, however; it could display only a fixed palette of 16 colors, whereas the distortion in the composite video could be used to create many more colors, albeit at very low resolution.

Then along came the VGA video signal format. This was a bit of a peculiarity: analog RGB video. Unlike digital RGB of the time, it was not limited in color depth, and could represent an image with 24-bit color, no problem. Unlike composite video, it had separate signal lines for each primary color, so any color within the gamut was equally representable, and it had enough bandwidth on each of those lines to cleanly transmit a 640×480 image at 60Hz with pretty much perfect fidelity.

However, someone at IBM was apparently a bit of a perfectionist, as a VGA cable is capable of carrying an image of up to 2048×1536 resolution at 85Hz, or at lower resolutions, refresh rates of 100Hz or more, all with 24-bit color depth—far beyond what the original VGA graphics chips and associated IBM 85xx-series displays could handle.

Also, the VGA cable system bundled every signal line into a single cable and connector, so no more figuring out which cable plugs in where, and it being so future-proof meant that, for pretty much the entire '90s, you could buy any old computer display and plug it into any old computer and it would just work.

Pretty impressive for an analog video signal/cable/connector designed in 1987.

[–] hare_ware@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't stop using VGA until I had a monitor new enough to not support it. Also, DVI was great because of the VGA support.

[–] shpit 2 points 1 year ago

I still use it

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago

gamerz like me:

Red, Blue and Green Component cables

[–] Kratos@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 year ago

This is actually a pretty helpful diagram for when I inevitably forget which color does what

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Channel 03 gang represent!

[–] darvocet@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is RCA. Wasn’t composite early HD with RBG-RW?

[–] Davel23@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're thinking of component. The two are (or were) frequently mixed up.

[–] darvocet@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep, you’re right! Ah the memories.

[–] sdoorex@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A good way to remember is that RGB on the same wire is a Composite signal whereas when they have their own cables they are sent as individual Components.

[–] Hyperi0n@lemmy.film 2 points 1 year ago

Composite is Red, White(Sometimes black) and Yellow.

The best way to remember is Composite rhymes with shit.

[–] randomguy2323@lemmy.kevitprojects.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] KernelAddict@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

These are older audio/video cables. Back in the days, before HDMI came around you connected your TV to other components (VCR, cable box, HiFi, sound system, etc.) with these cables. Red and White were the audio cables for left and right channels. Yellow was for the video feed.

So when we consider the artists in the meme: Van Gogh, only had one ear and both his eyes, so he has a single audio cable (mono instead of stereo) and a video cable.

Beethoven only has the video cable because he was deaf.

Stevie wonder has both audio cables but no video cable because he is blind.

I hope that makes more sense :)

[–] Pixlbabble@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago