this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
16 points (100.0% liked)

Star Trek

450 readers
4 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episodes, as well as previews for upcoming episodes. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
11-14 LD 5x05 "Starbase 80?!"
11-21 LD 5x06 "Of Gods and Angles"
11-28 LD 5x07 "Fully Dilated"
12-05 LD 5x08 "Upper Decks"
12-12 LD 5x09 "Fissue Quest"

Episode Discussion Archive


In Production

Strange New Worlds (2025)

Section 31 (2025-01-24)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)

In Development

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.


Allied Discord Server


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lwaxana_katana@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I found this episode of The Ready Room made me feel less good about the main episode. For example, at the end they're recapping why eugenics is banned in the Federation, and they say it's because of "potentially violent impulses". But in Doctor Bashir, I Presume it's established that it is not just because of the eugenics wars, but because if you allow genetic augmentation it creates a medical arms race where parents feel compelled to genetically augment their children to keep up. Is that being retconned or was just it just a badly written summary? We really don't need Star Trek to be making the case for eugenics, you guys...

"Doctor Bashir, I Presume" makes the case that augments can be unstable and dangerous.

Two hundred years ago we tried to improve the species through DNA resequencing, and what did we get for our trouble? The Eugenics Wars. For every Julian Bashir that can be created, there's a Khan Singh waiting in the wings. A superhuman whose ambition and thirst for power have been enhanced along with his intellect. The law against genetic engineering provides a firewall against such men, and it's my job to keep that firewall intact.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's safe to say that the attitudes toward genetic modification will shift and morph over time. In the TOS era, violent conflicts with augments are much more recent history, so it makes sense that that's the first justification that comes into play in these discussions.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah. I'm willing to accept that attitudes towards a technology change over a century. What would environmentalism look like in 1923 compared to now?

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I very much appreciate that you’ve posted the region-free link for this.

The videos at startrek.com come with their own annoyances, but I will always post them over alternatives for exactly that reason.

The holographic display the guy uses in next week's preview is extremely reminiscent of the TCARS bridge consoles on the USS Relativity...

load more comments
view more: next ›