this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
92 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

217 readers
9 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Abortion rights group places remaining 15 Conservatives on list of anti-choice MPs after vote on ‘fetal rights’ bill

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago

Conservatives. The type that don't support abortion because "think of the children!", but fly flags on their vehicles that say "Fuck Trudeau" with children walking down the sidewalk and sitting in the cars beside them.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 19 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A vote on a controversial bill meant to expand “fetal rights” in Canada has left the country without a single pro-choice Conservative MP, according to an abortion watchdog organization.

This week, the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada (ARCC) placed the last remaining 15 Conservatives on its list of anti-choice MPs after they voted in support of Bill C-311, dubbed the Violence Against Pregnant Women Act.

ARCC’s executive director, Joyce Arthur, said the private member’s bill was a thinly veiled attempt to encroach on Canada’s longstanding view that fetuses do not have personhood status.

Previous bills – the latest of which were also sponsored by Wagantall – have tried to ban sex-selective abortion (which is not widely practised in Canada) and to criminally punish people who injure a fetus while committing a crime against a pregnant person.

The Conservatives have long allowed free, unwhipped votes on issues related to abortion, euthanasia, conversion therapy and other “matters of conscience”.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Dearche@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago

I thought this sort of extremism was more of a feature of the States, but to think that it had infected our country as well to such a degree. The hilarious thing is that it was the religious figures that were originally pro-choice decades ago and were one of the deciding factors why abortions were originally legalized.

It's hard to imagine that this is considered a right wing issue rather than something radical, but more and more it feels like the right are defining themselves through the act of degrading personal freedoms and rolling back the clock wherever they can to the Victorian era.

[–] Cobrachickenwing@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago

O'Toole got voted out of the conservative leadership because of social conservatives. This is just the cumulation of that.

[–] HanDman@infosec.pub 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because conservatives are/represent and are voted for by religious fundamentalists.

[–] Ulrich_the_Old@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Show me in the bible where is mentions "fetal heartbeat"??

[–] AshDene@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The funny thing about religious fundamentalists is their beliefs frequently outright contradict the written word of their religion...

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

That's a side effect of them not actually reading that book they claim is the "most important words ever written".