Creative

4267 readers

1 users here now

Beehaw's section for your art and original content, other miscellaneous creative works you've found, and discussion of the creative arts and how they happen generally. Covers everything from digital to physical; photography to painting; abstract to photorealistic; and everything in between.

(It's not mandatory, but we also encourage providing a description of your image(s) for accessibility purposes! See here for a more detailed explanation and advice on how best to do this.)

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Writing

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

remington

alyaza

Kamirose

Demon Copperhead-thoughts? (lemm.ee)

submitted 1 year ago by josabrim@lemm.ee to c/creative

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I’m reading Demon Copperhead and I’ve only just realised that it’s based on David Copperfield by Charles Dickens. Somehow, I feel cheated. I hated Dickens in school - melodramatic claptrap - but it does explain the ‘serial’ feel of the book. It’s a clever book, the characters are credible, going beyond characterisation (another of my pet Dickens’ peeves.) And the writing is beautiful, wonderful imagery etc.

I know there’s nothing new under the sun and all tales are variations on a theme. This book, though, barely even changes the characters’ names.

I’m so disappointed. I don’t know what to think. And I’ve lost interest in finishing the book. Have you read it? What are your thoughts? #books #PulitzerPrize #lazywriting #writers

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Kwakigra 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Adapting an old idea your own way isn't laziness, it's basically how any new art is made at all. If this author's transformation of something you didn't enjoy is something you do enjoy, what really is wrong with it?

[–] josabrim@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I guess that’s what I’m trying to work out. It could just be my own bias against Dickens.