this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
62 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37735 readers
53 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] amotoohno 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Ironically, you cannot find out if your car is affected unless you’re willing to share your VIN with the helpful folks at privacy4cars.com

So, since I don’t own a model specifically listed in the story and I value my privacy …

Edit: I was wrong, they would much rather I download their helpful app and use that software they’re implanting on my PHONE to help me re-assert my right to privacy 🤡

[–] Seathru 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you do want to check your car more anonymously, make up numbers for the last 6 digits. The first 11 contain all the make/model/options info, the last 6 digits are unique to each vehicle.

[–] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I just gave it a test run with a nonsense vin, to see if they wanted more info. they don't. Your vin is not private information - its connection to you is (sort of, the dmv's records are actually public). So if you cared to use this tool, just use a vpn and you're all set.

It's probably wise to assume everyone on the internet is out to get you. But to provide some kinds of tools online, you have to ask for information.

[–] TheOtherJake 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Rule number one of buying a new car: get the dealer to disconnect the modem.

Cars should be entirely open source by government regulation. All software should be public and the manufacturer should be required to host and maintain a public toolchain that can reproduce the software and any revisions made. All of this should also get mirrored by the library of Congress and made publicly available as a second source indefinitely. This is about ownership. Digital rights are never okay to reserve. If I do not own everything I am only renting from the real owner. Proprietary goods are theft of ownership. It really is that simple.

[–] BashCat@wirebase.org 16 points 1 year ago

Agreed. Mercedes and others of EV vehicles now "rent" you horsepower. For a extra fee your car's horsepower won't be throttled or limited. Ahhh technology....we've came so far. 🐈‍⬛

[–] Rentlar 4 points 1 year ago

I'm glad that requesting dealerships disconnect modems is a thing, I was thinking I may have to McGuyver a solution like de-solder the antenna myself! I'm not in the marker for a new car yet but I may be soon, who knows.

[–] UprisingVoltage@feddit.it 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

👏 Do 👏 not 👏 buy 👏 smart 👏 stuff 👏

[–] moon_matter@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Voting with your wallet doesn't work here. People will choose the most convenient option and the other options will eventually start to disappear. Like safety, this needs to be regulated because security and privacy is by definition inconvenient.

[–] UprisingVoltage@feddit.it 4 points 1 year ago

Sad but true. For now I encourage everyone to buy second-hand: less waste, less money to greedy corps and more to both the person we buy from and ourselves

[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It really depends, I would say do not buy InternetOfThings stuff. As long as it's only accessible locally you should be good. And then you can expose to yourself on the Internet via VPN or something with https://www.home-assistant.io/

[–] UprisingVoltage@feddit.it 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, don't buy smart suff you have no control on would've been a better way to phrase it. Ty for explaining it

[–] Ronno@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

FTFY: 👏 Do 👏 not 👏 buy 👏 smart 👏 stuff 👏connected 👏to 👏the 👏 internet 👏
Nothing wrong with wanting smart stuff, as long as it doesn't send your data. For example, I run all my home automation hardware on a local network that cannot speak to the web, yet I can control everything I want just as the next guy with his fancy Alexa, Google or whatever, but my house doesn't leak as much data.

For cars this is still very difficult to do. The only way we can stop sharing as much data would be if we had legislation that would ban this type of information sharing/data mining. In Europe we tried barking, but we didn't bite. The GDPR is a joke, forcing people to consent to cookies, net result is nothing. They should have banned data mining, fingerprinting and tracking al together, but the tech lobby is way too powerful for that.

[–] UprisingVoltage@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, smart stuff is only worth buying if you know what you're doing. I wouldn't bother with it otherwise.

I don't like at all the direction we're taking with cars, they're getting too invasive. They're also extremely inefficient compared to a proper public transport infrastructure

[–] Ronno@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Agree with cars becoming more invasive, but disagree that they are less efficient. The only places where public transport shines is in cities. Outside of cities, it is very difficult to make public transport efficient enough to make it worthwhile. I live in The Netherlands, which is the size of a post stamp, and even here, when you don't live in the city your commute is 3 to 4 times longer by public transport than a car.

[–] Drewski@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

That's why I'll probably drive older cars the rest of my life.

load more comments
view more: next ›