this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
188 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1039 readers
20 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ennuigo@lemm.ee 37 points 2 years ago (3 children)

What is with this guy and his hardon for adding “X” to everything? He’s like a teenager that thinks that adding flame decals to anything makes them “cooler”.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 years ago

It's halfway to a swastika.

[–] glacier@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 years ago

The x stands for xtremely shitty.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

Teslax - Ask your pharmacist today what Teslax can do for you.

[–] taylus@lemmy.ml 37 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’m so glad we got this instead of solving global warming

[–] AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Well Elon can hardly masturbate to being on global warming all day, can he?! /s

[–] Daydreamer@lemmy.ml 34 points 2 years ago (3 children)

It is entirely possible that he just wrecks companies for fun.

[–] 30isthenew29@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

This is just what billionaires do nowadays.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

What other companies has he wrecked?

[–] CalamityJoe@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago

Or on purpose, in this case.

Rebranding at this level sounds very much like purposeful destruction of an existing resource and company, rather than an attempt to make the company any better, successful, or more profitable.

I'm starting to wonder if the Saudis have told him they'll reimburse any of his personal losses from his stock buy, in return for sinking and destroying the company.

It just seems like the Musk buy, once it happened, has been too effective a means of destroying a platform that was previously used extensively by protestors and activists to organise mass group activity against governments and authorities.

It would certainly be my answer now to those regular Reddit questions like "what's the one conspiracy theory you actually believe is true?"

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Pay $44 billion for a well known and popular company, ditch the name and the logo for something totally new and unknown.

So smart.

[–] 30isthenew29@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

It’s beyond our thinking. Minimum above 300 IQ needed to understand this.

[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Getting rid of the last remaining identifiable part of the company. Genius move.

[–] UnverifiedAPK@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Actually if he uses a color besides blue/purple it'll make Twitter stand out from the crowd.

I mean... it's not going to go well with Elon at the helm, but it's too early to hate on a rebrand just yet.

[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 5 points 2 years ago

it’s too early to hate on a rebrand just yet

There was no reason to rebrand when he bought Twitter. Why the hell would someone rebrand an internationally recognized logo? Especially one that was pretty well regarded just a year ago (at least for a social media site).

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I've been using a moniker containing two Xs for over two decades. Speaking on behalf of my early-20s self, how fucking edgy do you believe yourself to be as one of the world's richest persons embracing a single letter as the epitome of logos to represent your umbrella corporation? Hire a branding team, you pathetically dull gen-x neckbeard edgelord manchild.

Seriously, the '90s called a they want their X back.

[–] Ducks@ducks.dev 8 points 2 years ago

He doesn't need a branding team, he's too smart for that. That's why he is also sourcing a logo from the Twitter community. Because ~~billionaires~~ geniuses don't pay for anything.

[–] appel@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago

That man's got no god damn sense.

[–] CraigeryTheKid 12 points 2 years ago

A ditch would make a much better logo, indeed.

[–] PurliWhite 11 points 2 years ago

watching the flames reach new heights on this continually evolving dumpster fire keeps me warm at night

[–] DarthYoshiBoy@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

I choose to believe he's just doing this for memes at this point. I can't accept humans are capable of these depths through inadvertent action, it's just too dumb.

[–] Umbra@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] blivet@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

I think we are in the midst of a worldwide epidemic of mental illness, and even the wealthiest and most powerful are not immune.

[–] 30isthenew29@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I’m here for it…

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Do we need to stop calling them tweets then?

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 15 points 2 years ago

The new word will be 'twats', after it's owner

[–] quicken@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago

Call it a twix?

[–] 30isthenew29@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How do I ‘get lucky’ too with becoming a billionaire like Elon randomly did??????????????????????????????????????????????

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Thing is, he didn't just randomly get lucky. He put in a huge amount of work and actually had a lot of good ideas. People love to hate Elon Musk, and when you hate someone you're loathe to admit to any positives about him, but he actually is smart in certain fields. It's not sheer coincidence that most of the companies he bought or started before this Twitter debacle grew immensely and made great advances. You can say that's because he "hired the right people," but that itself is a skill - knowing who to hire and what resources and projects to give them.

Unfortunately, I think Musk has been so successful for so long that he's become convinced he's good at everything. And as we're seeing now, he seems to have found something he's really not good at. He's new at running a social media company and this is the first time he's bought a really big pre-established company with a different culture than he's used to and there's clearly some trouble there. But I guess time will tell just what happens to Twitter in the long run.

[–] 30isthenew29@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I respect your opinion, but I just don’t think he’s that smart..

[–] Megaman_EXE 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm fairly certain anyone with enough startup capital, heck even just a safety net, can make it big. The issue is most people don't have either.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Millionaires are actually pretty common.

[–] trashhalo 5 points 2 years ago

Might be better for technology. But I see it's already posted there 🤷

[–] JIMMERZ@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

It’s almost like he’s intentionally trying to tank this company. What would be the benefit for him? A massive tax write-off?

[–] cousinofjah 3 points 2 years ago

Duck Dodgers should sue.

[–] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] I_Miss_Daniel@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

This.. Is an ex.... Parrot.

[–] 30isthenew29@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This will make the last people go away that had stayed. Total waste of money now.